首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Complementarity As Generative Principle: A Thought Pattern for Aesthetic Appreciations and Cognitive Appraisals in General
【2h】

Complementarity As Generative Principle: A Thought Pattern for Aesthetic Appreciations and Cognitive Appraisals in General

机译:作为生成原理的互补性:一般审美与认知评价的思维模式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In experimental aesthetics the relationship between the arts and cognitive neuroscience has gained particular interest in recent years. But has cognitive neuroscience indeed something to offer when studying the arts? Here we present a theoretical frame within which the concept of complementarity as a generative or creative principle is proposed; neurocognitive processes are characterized by the duality of complementary activities like bottom-up and top-down control, or logistical functions like temporal control and content functions like perceptions in the neural machinery. On that basis a thought pattern is suggested for aesthetic appreciations and cognitive appraisals in general. This thought pattern is deeply rooted in the history of philosophy and art theory since antiquity; and complementarity also characterizes neural operations as basis for cognitive processes. We then discuss some challenges one is confronted with in experimental aesthetics; in our opinion, one serious problem is the lack of a taxonomy of functions in psychology and neuroscience which is generally accepted. This deficit makes it next to impossible to develop acceptable models which are similar to what has to be modeled. Another problem is the severe language bias in this field of research as knowledge gained in many languages over the ages remains inaccessible to most scientists. Thus, an inspection of research results or theoretical concepts is necessarily too narrow. In spite of these limitations we provide a selective summary of some results and viewpoints with a focus on visual art and its appreciation. It is described how questions of art and aesthetic appreciations using behavioral methods and in particular brain-imaging techniques are analyzed and evaluated focusing on such issues like the representation of artwork or affective experiences. Finally, we emphasize complementarity as a generative principle on a practical level when artists and scientists work directly together which can lead to new insights and broader perspectives on both sides.
机译:在实验美学中,近年来,艺术与认知神经科学之间的关系引起了特别的兴趣。但是,在学习艺术时,确实有提供认知神经科学的东西吗?在这里,我们提出了一个理论框架,在其中提出了互补性作为一种生成或创造原理的概念。神经认知过程的特征是互补活动的双重性,如自下而上和自上而下的控制,或后勤功能(如时间控制)和内容功能(如神经机器中的感知)。在此基础上,提出了一种思维模式,通常用于审美和认知评估。自古代以来,这种思想模式就深深植根于哲学和艺术理论的历史。互补性也将神经操作表征为认知过程的基础。然后,我们讨论了实验美学所面临的一些挑战。我们认为,一个严重的问题是缺乏心理学和神经科学中的功能分类法,这是公认的。这种缺陷使得几乎不可能开发出与必须建模的模型相似的可接受模型。另一个问题是该研究领域的语言偏见严重,因为大多数科学家仍然无法获得许多年来使用多种语言获得的知识。因此,对研究结果或理论概念的检查必然过于狭窄。尽管存在这些局限性,我们还是提供了一些结果和观点的选择性总结,重点是视觉艺术及其欣赏。它描述了如何使用行为方法,尤其是脑成像技术,对艺术和美学欣赏方面的问题进行分析和评估,重点是诸如艺术品的表现或情感体验之类的问题。最后,当艺术家和科学家直接合作时,我们强调互补性是在实践上的生成原则,这可以导致双方都有新见解和更广阔的视野。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号