首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery
【2h】

Factors Affecting Length of Stay Following Elective Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

机译:影响颈椎前路和后路择期手术后住院时间的因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundDisease of the cervical spine is widely prevalent, most commonly secondary to degenerative disc changes and spondylosis.ObjectiveThe goal of the paper was to identify a possible discrepancy regarding the length of stay (LOS) between the anterior and posterior approaches to elective cervical spine surgery and identify contributing factors.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on 587 patients (341 anterior, 246 posterior) that underwent elective cervical spinal surgery between October 2001 and March 2014. Pre- and intraoperative data were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) and the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY).ResultsAverage LOS was 3.21 ± 0.32 days for patients that benefited from the anterior approach cervical spinal surgery and 5.28 ± 0.37 days for patients that benefited from the posterior approach surgery, P-value < 0.0001. Anterior patients had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (2.43 ± 0.036 vs. 2.70 ± 0.044). Anterior patients also had fewer intervertebral levels operated upon (2.18 ± 0.056 vs. 4.11 ± 0.13), shorter incisions (5.49 ± 0.093 cm vs. 9.25 ± 0.16 cm), lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (183.8 ± 9.0 cc vs. 340.0 ± 8.7 cc), and shorter procedure times (4.12 ± 0.09 hours vs. 4.47 ± 0.10 hours). Chi-squared tests for hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma showed no significant difference between groups.Conclusions:Patients with anterior surgery performed experienced a length of stay that was 2.07 days shorter on average. Higher EBL, longer incisions, more intervertebral levels, and longer operating time were significantly associated with the posterior approach. Future studies should include multiple surgeons. The goal would be to create a model that could accurately predict the postoperative length of stay based on patient and operative factors.
机译:背景颈椎疾病广泛存在,最常见于继发性椎间盘退变和脊椎病。目的本文的目的是确定选择性颈椎手术前路和后路之间的住院时间(LOS)可能存在差异。方法回顾性研究2001年10月至2014年3月间587例行颈椎择期手术的患者(前341名,后246名)。对术前和术中数据进行了分析。使用GraphPad Prism 5(GraphPad Software,Inc.,CA,La Jolla)和社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)(IBM SPSS Statistics,Armonk,NY)进行统计分析,结果患者的平均LOS为3.21±0.32天颈椎前路入路手术受益;而后路入路手术的患者受益时间为5.28±0.37天,P值<0.0001。前路患者的美国麻醉医师学会评分较低(2.43±0.036比2.70±0.044)。前路手术患者的椎间盘水平也较少(2.18±0.056 vs. 4.11±0.13),切口较短(5.49±0.093 cm对9.25±0.16 cm),估计失血量(EBL)较低(183.8±9.0 cc对340.0 ±8.7 cc)和较短的操作时间(4.12±0.09小时vs. 4.47±0.10小时)。在高血压,冠状动脉疾病,充血性心力衰竭,慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘的卡方检验中,两组之间无显着差异。结论:进行前外科手术的患者的住院时间平均缩短了2.07天。较高的EBL,更长的切口,更多的椎间盘水平和更长的手术时间与后入路显着相关。未来的研究应包括多名外科医生。目标是创建一个可以根据患者和手术因素准确预测术后住院时间的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号