首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in RegulatoryToxicology and Pharmacology
【2h】

Tobacco papers and tobacco industry ties in RegulatoryToxicology and Pharmacology

机译:烟草纸与烟草业在法规中的联系毒理学与药理学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined the relationship between the tobacco industry and the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (RTP) using the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library and internet sources. We determined the funding relationships, and categorised the conclusions of all 52 RTP papers on tobacco or nicotine between January 2013 and June 2015, as “positive”, “negative” or “neutral” for the tobacco industry. RTP’s editor, 57% (4/7) of associate editors and 37% (14/38) of editorial board members had worked or consulted for tobacco companies. Almost all (96%, 50/52) of the papers had authors with tobacco industry ties. Seventy-six percent (38/50) of these papers drew conclusions positive for industry; none drew negative conclusions. The two papers by authors not related to the tobacco industry reached conclusions negative to the industry (p <.001). These results call into question the confidence that members of the scientific community and tobacco product regulators worldwide can have in the conclusions of papers published in RTP.
机译:我们使用真相烟草行业文档库和互联网资源检查了烟草行业与期刊《法规毒理学和药理学》(RTP)之间的关系。我们确定了资金关系,并将2013年1月至2015年6月之间关于烟草或尼古丁的所有52篇RTP论文的结论归类为烟草业的“积极”,“消极”或“中性”。 RTP的编辑,57%(4/7)的副编辑和37%(14/38)的编辑委员会成员曾为烟草公司工作或咨询过。几乎所有论文(96%,50/52)的作者都与烟草业有联系。这些论文中有百分之七十六(38/50)得出对行业有利的结论。没有人得出负面结论。作者的两篇与烟草业无关的论文得出的结论对该行业不利(p <.001)。这些结果令人质疑,全球科学界和烟草制品监管机构的成员对RTP上发表的论文结论具有的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号