首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same or distinct dimensions?
【2h】

Intentionality and meta-awareness of mind wandering: Are they one and the same or distinct dimensions?

机译:思维游荡的意向性和元意识:它们是相同还是相同或不同的维度?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Researchers have recently demonstrated that mind-wandering episodes can vary on numerous dimensions, and it has been suggested that assessing these dimensions will play an important role in our understanding of mind wandering. One dimension that has received considerable attention in recent work is the intentionality of mind wandering. Although it has been claimed that indexing the intentionality of mind wandering will be necessary if researchers are to obtain a coherent understanding of the wandering mind, one concern is that this dimension might be redundant with another, longstanding, dimension: namely, meta-awareness. Thus, the utility of the argument for assessing intentionality rests upon a demonstration that this dimension is distinct from the meta-awareness dimension. To shed light on this issue, across two studies we compared and contrasted these dimensions to determine whether they are redundant or distinct. In both studies, we found support for the view that these dimensions are distinct.
机译:研究人员最近证明,思维游荡的发作可以在许多维度上变化,并且有人建议评估这些维度将在我们对思维游荡的理解中起重要作用。在最近的工作中受到关注的一个方面是思维游荡的故意性。尽管有人声称,要使研究人员对流浪思维有一个连贯的了解,就必须对转脑的意图进行索引,但人们担心的是,这一维度可能与另一个长期存在的维度(即元意识)是多余的。因此,该论点用于评估意向性的效用取决于该维度与元认知维度不同的证明。为了阐明这一问题,我们在两项研究中对这些维度进行了比较和对比,以确定它们是多余的还是不同的。在两项研究中,我们都支持这些维度是不同的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号