首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Counterpoint: Staying Honest When Policy Changes Backfire
【2h】

Counterpoint: Staying Honest When Policy Changes Backfire

机译:对立面:当政策改变适得其反时保持诚实

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the good intentions of FDA, many drug warnings are ineffective or have unintended consequences, particularly if the media exaggerates the messages and scares the public. The controversial 2003–04 FDA warnings on youth suicidal ideation associated with antidepressant use are a case in point. In a 10-year interrupted time series analysis (ITS) in 11 health plans, we found that the warnings and hyped media coverage led to substantial reductions in antidepressant use (declines in antidepressant use and overall care corroborated in several studies), and small, visible increases in ER and inpatient poisonings with psychotropic drugs. In a gross misunderstanding of the method, Dr. Stone calls ITS, “an intuition based upon false analogies, fallacious assumptions and analytical error.” We demonstrate visually in landmark studies that ITS is one of the oldest (hundreds of years) and strongest quasi-experimental study designs, and that his alternative data analyses do not even have rates (denominators), nor baselines, so the measures of change are invalid.
机译:尽管有FDA的良好意愿,但许多药物警告仍然无效或有意想不到的后果,尤其是在媒体夸大信息并吓public公众的情况下。有争议的2003–04 FDA警告与抗抑郁药使用有关的自杀意念就是一个例子。在对11个健康计划进行的为期10年的时间序列中断分析(ITS)中,我们发现警告和媒体大肆宣传导致抗抑郁药的使用大量减少(在一些研究中证实了抗抑郁药的使用和整体护理的下降),而且规模小,精神药物引起的急诊室和住院中毒明显增加。斯通博士对这种方法有严重的误解,称其为“基于错误类比,谬误性假设和分析错误的直觉”。我们在具有里程碑意义的研究中直观地证明了ITS是最古老的(数百年)和最强大的准实验研究设计之一,并且他的替代数据分析甚至没有速率(分母),也没有基准,因此变化的度量是无效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号