首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Efficacy of Hanks balanced salt solution compared to other solutions in the preservation of the periodontal ligament. A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Efficacy of Hanks balanced salt solution compared to other solutions in the preservation of the periodontal ligament. A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:与其他溶液相比汉克的均衡盐溶液在牙周膜保存方面的功效。系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) aimed to verify the capacity of different storage media to preserve viability of periodontal ligament cells in comparison to Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution. The searches, selection process, data extraction and Risk of Bias control were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Five MA were conducted to compare the cell viability between milk versus Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) in a dichotomous (1) or continuous (2) data model; tap water versus HBSS (3); medicinal herbals versus HBSS (4); and saline solution versus HBSS (5). 693 potentially studies were identified, with 18 studies included in the qualitative and 8 studies included in the quantitative analysis. Most of the articles presented a low risk of bias. HBSS medium showed a superior ratio of cell viability compared to tap water (RR 0.26; 95% CI [0.21, 0.32]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 96%) and saline solution (RR 0.76; 95% CI [0.69, 0.84]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 99%). Herbal medicines showed a similar ratio of cell viability when compared to HBSS (RR 0.97; 95% CI [0.94, 1.00]; p = 0.08; I2 = 50%). Mixed results were observed between milk and HBSS: a superior ratio of HBSS was observed in an overall evaluation (RR 0.26; 95% CI [0.21, 0.32]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 96%), and a similar ratio was achieved when periodontal ligament (PDL) cells were removed prior to immersion in the solution (RR 0.94; 95% CI [0.87, 1.01]; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%) or rinsed in tap water or maintained in open air prior to immersion (RR 0.63; 95% CI [0.35, 1.12]; p = 0.11; I2 = not applicable). This systematic review and MA suggests that milk and herbal medicines could represent an alternative to HBSS. However, more studies are necessary to obtain a reliable conclusion.
机译:这项系统的审查和荟萃分析(MA)旨在验证与汉克的“均衡盐溶液”相比,不同存储介质保持牙周膜细胞活力的能力。搜索,选择过程,数据提取和偏见风险控制均根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行。在二分(1)或连续(2)数据模型中,进行了5次MA来比较牛奶与Hank的平衡盐溶液(HBSS)之间的细胞活力;自来水与HBSS(3);草药与HBSS的比较(4);和盐溶液对比HBSS(5)。确定了693项潜在研究,定性研究包括18项,定量分析研究包括8项研究。大多数文章提出的偏见风险低。与自来水(RR 0.26; 95%CI [0.21,0.32]; p <0.00001; I2 = 96%)和盐溶液(RR 0.76; 95%CI [0.69,0.84])相比,HBSS培养基显示出更高的细胞活力比率; p <0.0001; I2 = 99%)。与HBSS相比,草药显示出相似的细胞活力比率(RR 0.97; 95%CI [0.94,1.00]; p = 0.08; I 2 = 50%)。在牛奶和HBSS之间观察到混合结果:在整体评估中观察到较高的HBSS比率(RR 0.26; 95%CI [0.21,0.32]; p <0.00001; I 2 = 96%) ,然后在浸入溶液中之前去除牙周膜(PDL)细胞(RR 0.94; 95%CI [0.87,1.01]; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%)或在自来水或在浸入之前保持在露天环境中(RR 0.63; 95%CI [0.35,1.12]; p = 0.11; I2 =不适用)。该系统评价和MA认为,牛奶和草药可以替代HBSS。但是,需要进行更多的研究才能得出可靠的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号