首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Healthcare Engineering >Comparison of Two Innovative Strategies Using Augmented Reality for Communication in Aesthetic Dentistry: A Pilot Study
【2h】

Comparison of Two Innovative Strategies Using Augmented Reality for Communication in Aesthetic Dentistry: A Pilot Study

机译:美学界中使用增强现实进行交流的两种创新策略的比较:一项初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During dental prosthetic rehabilitation, communication and conception are achieved using rigorous methodologies such as smile design protocols. The aim of the present pilot study was to compare two innovative strategies that used augmented reality for communication in dentistry. These strategies enable the user to instantly try a virtual smile proposition by taking a set of pictures from different points of view or by using the iPad as an enhanced mirror. Sixth-year dental students (n=18, women = 13, men = 5, mean age = 23.8) were included in this pilot study and were asked to answer a 5-question questionnaire studying the user experience using a visual analog scale (VAS). Answers were converted into a numerical result ranging from 0 to 100 for statistical analysis. Participants were not able to report a difference between the two strategies in terms of handling of the device (p=0.45), quality of the reconstruction (p=0.73), and fluidity of the software (p=0.67). Even if the participants' experience with the enhanced mirror was more often reported as immersive and more likely to be integrated in a daily dental office practice, no significant increase was reported (p=0.15 and p=0.07). Further investigations are required to evaluate time and cost savings in daily practice. Software accuracy is also a major point to investigate in order to go further in clinical applications.
机译:在假牙修复过程中,可以使用严格的方法(例如笑容设计方案)来实现沟通和构思。本试验研究的目的是比较两种使用增强现实技术进行牙科交流的创新策略。这些策略使用户可以通过从不同角度拍摄一组照片或将iPad用作增强型镜子来立即尝试虚拟的微笑建议。这项实验研究包括六年级的牙科学生(n = 18,女性= 13,男性= 5,平均年龄were = 23.8),并被要求回答使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)研究用户体验的5个问题问卷)。将答案转换为0到100范围内的数值结果以进行统计分析。参与者无法报告两种策略在设备处理(p = 0.45),重建质量(p = 0.73)和软件的流动性(p = 0.67)之间的差异。即使参加者使用增强型镜子的体验更多地被认为是沉浸式的,并且更有可能被整合到日常的牙科诊所中,也没有发现明显的增加(p = 0.15和p = 0.07)。需要进一步调查以评估日常实践中节省的时间和成本。为了在临床应用中走得更远,软件准确性也是要研究的重点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号