首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The association of choroidal structure and its response to anti-VEGF treatment with the short-time outcome in pachychoroid neovasculopathy
【2h】

The association of choroidal structure and its response to anti-VEGF treatment with the short-time outcome in pachychoroid neovasculopathy

机译:脉络膜脉络膜新生血管病脉络膜结构及其对抗VEGF治疗的反应与短期预后的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) shares some anatomical features with other pachychoroid spectrum diseases, but little is known about the characteristics on the treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). We investigated the effect of choroidal structure and responses to anti-VEGF on the prognosis of pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) and other types of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (non-PNV). Twenty-one eyes with PNV and 34 eyes with non-PNV who had anti-VEGF treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) area at baseline was measured with fluorescein angiography (FAG). The luminal and stromal area in the choroid was measured by enhanced-depth-imaging (EDI) OCT at baseline and 1 month. The association between dry macula or LogMAR VA (visual acuity, VA) at 1 month and baseline values or changes in the luminal or stromal area at 1 month, baseline CNV area, or anti-VEGF drugs were analyzed in patients with or without PNV. In non-PNV, change of luminal area (coefficient = 7.0×10−5, p = 0.0001), baseline CNV area (coefficient = 0.18, p = 0.033), and aflibercept vs. ranibizumab (coefficient = 0.29, p = 0.0048) were chosen as predictors for dry macula by the model selection. Similarly, in non-PNV, change of luminal area (coefficient = 6.1×10−6, p = 0.033), baseline CNV area (coefficient = 0.034, p = 0.022), and aflibercept vs. ranibizumab (coefficient = 0.056, p = 0.0020) were chosen as predictors for greater VA improvement. In PNV, however, none of these factors was chosen as predictors for dry macula or VA improvement by the model selection. The result of the present study implied that structural response after anti-VEGF might be different between non-PNV and PNV in the treatment with anti-VEGF agents.
机译:脉络膜脉络膜新生血管病(PNV)与其他脉络膜脉络膜频谱疾病具有一些解剖学特征,但对抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的治疗特征知之甚少。我们调查了脉络膜结构和抗VEGF的反应对脉络膜新生血管病(PNV)和其他类型的新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(non-PNV)的预后的影响。回顾性分析了接受抗VEGF治疗的21只PNV眼和34只非PNV眼。基线时的脉络膜新血管形成(CNV)面积通过荧光素血管造影(FAG)测量。在基线和1个月时,通过增强深度成像(EDI)OCT测量脉络膜的腔和基质区域。在有或没有PNV的患者中分析了1个月时干性黄斑或LogMAR VA(视敏度VA)与基线值或1个月时腔或基质面积,基线CNV面积或抗VEGF药物的变化之间的关联。在非PNV中,管腔面积的变化(系数= 7.0×10 −5 ,p = 0.0001),基线CNV面积(系数= 0.18,p = 0.033)以及aflibercept vs. ranibizumab(系数)通过模型选择,选择了= 0.29,p = 0.0048)作为干性黄斑的预测指标。同样,在非PNV中,管腔面积(系数= 6.1×10 -6 ,p = 0.033),基线CNV面积(系数= 0.034,p = 0.022)以及阿柏西普与兰尼单抗的变化(系数= 0.056,p = 0.0020)被选作更大VA改善的预测指标。然而,在PNV中,通过选择模型,这些因素都没有被选为干性黄斑或VA改善的预测指标。本研究的结果表明,在抗PN因子药物治疗中,非PNV和PNV之间抗VEGF的结构反应可能有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号