首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Neuropsychology social cognition and global functioning among bipolar schizophrenic patients and healthy controls: preliminary data
【2h】

Neuropsychology social cognition and global functioning among bipolar schizophrenic patients and healthy controls: preliminary data

机译:双相精神分裂症患者和健康对照者的神经心理学社会认知和整体功能:初步数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to determine the extent of impairment in social and non-social cognitive domains in an ecological context comparing bipolar (BD), schizophrenic (SKZ) patients and healthy controls (HC). The sample was enrolled at the Department of Psychiatry of Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan; it includes stabilized SKZ patients (n = 30), euthymic bipolar patients (n = 18) and HC (n = 18). Patients and controls completed psychiatric assessment rating scales, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) and the Executive and Social Cognition Battery (ESCB) that contains both ecological tests of executive function and social cognition, in order to better detect cognitive deficits in patients with normal results in standard executive batteries. The three groups differed significantly for gender and substance abuse, however, the differences did not influence the results. BD patients showed less impairment on cognitive performance compared to SKZ patients, even in “ecological” tests that mimic real life scenarios. In particular, BD performed better than SKZ in verbal memory (p < 0.0038) and BACS symbol coding (p < 0.0043). Regarding the ESCB tests, in the Hotel task SKZ patients completed significantly less tasks (p < 0.001), showed a greater number of errors in Multiple Errands Test (MET-HV) (p < 0.0248) and a worse performance in Theory of Mind (ToM) tests (p < 0.001 for the Eyes test and Faux pas test). Both patients' groups performed significantly worse than HC. Finally, significant differences were found between the two groups in GAF scores, being greater among BD subjects (p < 0.001). GAF was correlated with BACS and ESCB scores showing the crucial role of cognitive and ecological performances in patients' global functioning.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过比较双相(BD),精神分裂症(SKZ)患者和健康对照(HC)在生态环境中确定社会和非社会认知领域的损害程度。该样本被纳入米兰大学Policlinico医院精神科。它包括稳定的SKZ患者(n = 30),常乐双相情感障碍患者(n = 18)和HC(n = 18)。患者和对照者完成了精神病学评估评分量表,精神分裂症认知简要评估(BACS)和执行和社会认知电池(ESCB),其中包含执行功能和社会认知的生态测试,以便更好地检测患者的认知缺陷标准执行器电池的测试结果正常。这三组在性别和药物滥用方面存在显着差异,但是差异并不影响结果。与SKZ患者相比,即使在模仿现实生活场景的“生态”测试中,BD患者的认知能力损害也较少。特别是,BD在语言记忆(p <0.0038)和BACS符号编码(p <0.0043)方面表现优于SKZ。关于ESCB测试,在酒店任务中,SKZ患者完成的任务明显少得多(p <0.001),在多重差事测试(MET-HV)中表现出更多的错误(p <0.0248),而在心理理论上的表现较差( ToM)测试(眼睛测试和Faux pas测试的p <0.001)。两组患者的表现均显着低于HC。最后,发现两组GAF评分之间存在显着差异,而BD受试者之间差异更大(p <0.001)。 GAF与BACS和ESCB评分相关,显示出认知和生态表现在患者整体功能中的关键作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号