首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment
【2h】

High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment

机译:高水平的精神病特征会改变道德选择但不会改变道德判断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Psychopathy is a personality disorder frequently associated with immoral behaviors. Previous behavioral studies on the influence of psychopathy on moral decision have yielded contradictory results, possibly because they focused either on judgment (abstract evaluation) or on choice of hypothetical action, two processes that may rely on different mechanisms. In this study, we explored the influence of the level of psychopathic traits on judgment and choice of hypothetical action during moral dilemma evaluation. A population of 102 students completed a questionnaire with ten moral dilemmas and nine non-moral dilemmas. The task included questions targeting both judgment (“Is it acceptable to … in order to …?”) and choice of hypothetical action (“Would you … in order to …?”). The level of psychopathic traits of each participant was evaluated with the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy (LSRP) scale. Logistic regression fitted with the generalized estimating equations method analyses were conducted using responses to the judgment and choice tasks as the dependent variables and psychopathy scores as predictor. Results show that a high level of psychopathic traits, and more specifically those related to affective deficit, predicted a greater proportion of utilitarian responses for the choice but not for the judgment question. There was no first-order interaction between the level of psychopathic traits and other potential predictors. The relation between a high level of psychopathic traits and increased utilitarianism in choice of action but not in moral judgment may explain the contradictory results of previous studies where these two processes were not contrasted. It also gives further support to the hypothesis that choice of action endorsement and abstract judgment during moral dilemma evaluation are partially distinct neural and psychological processes. We propose that this distinction should be better taken into account in the evaluation of psychopathic behaviors.
机译:精神病是一种经常与不道德行为相关的人格障碍。先前关于精神病对道德决策的影响的行为研究产生了矛盾的结果,可能是因为它们侧重于判断(抽象评估)或假设行动的选择,这两个过程可能依赖于不同的机制。在这项研究中,我们探讨了精神困境特征水平对道德困境评估中判断和假设行动选择的影响。共有102名学生完成了包含10个道德困境和9个非道德困境的问卷调查。任务包括针对判决(“为了……可以接受……?”)和假设行动的选择(“为了……可以……吗?”)的问题。使用Levenson自我报告精神病(LSRP)量表评估每个参与者的精神病性状水平。使用对判断和选择任务的响应作为因变量,对心理疾病评分作为预测因子,进行与广义估计方程方法分析相符的逻辑回归。结果表明,较高的精神病性状,尤其是与情感缺陷有关的精神状性状,预示着功利主义对选择的反应会更大,但对判断问题的反应却不多。在精神病性状水平和其他潜在的预测因素之间没有一阶相互作用。较高的精神病性状与功利主义在行动选择上而非道德判断上的增加之间的关系可能解释了先前研究中这两个过程没有对比的矛盾结果。它也为以下假设提供了进一步的支持:在道德困境评估过程中选择行为支持和抽象判断是部分不同的神经和心理过程。我们建议在评估精神病行为时应更好地考虑这种区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号