首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience >Illuminating the dark matter of social neuroscience: Considering the problem of social interaction from philosophical psychological and neuroscientific perspectives
【2h】

Illuminating the dark matter of social neuroscience: Considering the problem of social interaction from philosophical psychological and neuroscientific perspectives

机译:照亮社会神经科学的黑暗事物:从哲学心理和神经科学的角度考虑社会互动问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Successful human social interaction depends on our capacity to understand other people's mental states and to anticipate how they will react to our actions. Despite its importance to the human condition, the exact mechanisms underlying our ability to understand another's actions, feelings, and thoughts are still a matter of conjecture. Here, we consider this problem from philosophical, psychological, and neuroscientific perspectives. In a critical review, we demonstrate that attempts to draw parallels across these complementary disciplines is premature: The second-person perspective does not map directly to Interaction or Simulation theories, online social cognition, or shared neural network accounts underlying action observation or empathy. Nor does the third-person perspective map onto Theory-Theory (TT), offline social cognition, or the neural networks that support Theory of Mind (ToM). Moreover, we argue that important qualities of social interaction emerge through the reciprocal interplay of two independent agents whose unpredictable behavior requires that models of their partner's internal state be continually updated. This analysis draws attention to the need for paradigms in social neuroscience that allow two individuals to interact in a spontaneous and natural manner and to adapt their behavior and cognitions in a response contingent fashion due to the inherent unpredictability in another person's behavior. Even if such paradigms were implemented, it is possible that the specific neural correlates supporting such reciprocal interaction would not reflect computation unique to social interaction but rather the use of basic cognitive and emotional processes combined in a unique manner. Finally, we argue that given the crucial role of social interaction in human evolution, ontogeny, and every-day social life, a more theoretically and methodologically nuanced approach to the study of real social interaction will nevertheless help the field of social cognition to evolve.
机译:成功的人类社会互动取决于我们理解他人心理状态并预测他人将如何对我们的行为做出反应的能力。尽管它对人类状况很重要,但我们理解他人行为,感受和思想的能力所依据的确切机制仍然是一个推测。在这里,我们从哲学,心理学和神经科学的角度来考虑这个问题。在一项重要的评论中,我们证明尝试在这些互补学科之间进行相似性为时过早:第二人称视角未直接映射到交互或仿真理论,在线社交认知或行为观察或同理心所基于的共享神经网络帐户。第三人称视角也不会映射到理论理论(TT),离线社交认知或支持心理理论(ToM)的神经网络。此外,我们认为,社会互动的重要品质是通过两个独立主体的相互影响而出现的,他们的行为无法预测,因此需要不断更新其伴侣内部状态的模型。这项分析引起了人们对社会神经科学范式的需求,该范式允许两个人以自发和自然的方式进行互动,并由于另一个人的行为固有的不可预测性而以一种偶然的方式适应他们的行为和认知。即使实施了这种范例,支持这种相互互动的特定神经关联也可能不会反映社交互动所特有的计算,而是会以独特的方式结合使用基本的认知和情感过程。最后,我们认为,鉴于社会互动在人类进化,个体发育以及每天的社会生活中的关键作用,对理论上和方法上的细微差别进行真实社会互动研究的方法仍将有助于社会认知领域的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号