首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nanoscale Research Letters >Comparative studies on single-layer reduced graphene oxide films obtained by electrochemical reduction and hydrazine vapor reduction
【2h】

Comparative studies on single-layer reduced graphene oxide films obtained by electrochemical reduction and hydrazine vapor reduction

机译:电化学还原和肼蒸气还原法制得的单层还原氧化石墨烯薄膜的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The comparison between two kinds of single-layer reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets, obtained by reduction of graphene oxide (GO) with the electrochemical method and hydrazine vapor reduction, referred to as E-rGO and C-rGO, respectively, is systematically studied. Although there is no morphology difference between the E-rGO and C-rGO films adsorbed on solid substrates observed by AFM, the reduction process to obtain the E-rGO and C-rGO films is quite different. In the hydrazine vapor reduction, the nitrogen element is incorporated into the obtained C-rGO film, while no additional element is introduced to the E-rGO film during the electrochemical reduction. Moreover, Raman spectra show that the electrochemical method is more effective than the hydrazine vapor reduction method to reduce the GO films. In addition, E-rGO shows better electrocatalysis towards dopamine than does C-rGO. This study is helpful for researchers to understand these two different reduction methods and choose a suitable one to reduce GO based on their experimental requirements.
机译:系统地比较了通过电化学方法将氧化石墨烯(GO)还原和肼蒸气还原得到的两种单层还原氧化石墨烯(rGO)片,分别称为E-rGO和C-rGO。研究。尽管通过原子力显微镜观察到的吸附在固体基质上的E-rGO和C-rGO膜之间没有形态学差异,但是获得E-rGO和C-rGO膜的还原过程却大不相同。在肼蒸气还原中,将氮元素结合到所获得的C-rGO膜中,而在电化学还原过程中没有额外的元素引入到E-rGO膜中。而且,拉曼光谱表明,电化学方法比肼蒸气还原法更有效地还原GO膜。此外,与C-rGO相比,E-rGO对多巴胺的电催化性能更好。这项研究有助于研究人员了解这两种不同的还原方法,并根据他们的实验要求选择合适的方法还原GO。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号