首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ambio >Regional Management of Farmland Feeding Geese Using an Ecological Prioritization Tool
【2h】

Regional Management of Farmland Feeding Geese Using an Ecological Prioritization Tool

机译:利用生态优先排序工具对农田养鹅进行区域管理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Wild geese foraging on farmland cause increasing conflicts with agricultural interests, calling for a strategic approach to mitigation. In central Norway, conflicts between farmers and spring-staging pink-footed geese feeding on pastures have escalated. To alleviate the conflict, a scheme by which farmers are subsidized to allow geese to forage undisturbed was introduced. To guide allocation of subsidies, an ecological-based ranking of fields at a regional level was recommended and applied. Here we evaluate the scheme. On average, 40 % of subsidized fields were in the top 5 % of the ranking, and 80 % were within the top 20 %. Goose grazing pressure on subsidized pastures was 13 times higher compared to a stratified random selection of non-subsidized pastures, capturing 67 % of the pasture feeding geese despite that subsidized fields only comprised 13 % of the grassland area. Close dialogue between scientists and managers is regarded as a key to the success of the scheme.
机译:在农田上觅食的野鹅导致与农业利益的冲突日益加剧,因此呼吁采取战略性减缓措施。在挪威中部,农民和以草场为食的春季登场的粉红色雁之间的冲突已经升级。为了缓解这种冲突,引入了一项计划,该计划通过补贴农民的方式让鹅不受干扰地觅食。为了指导补贴分配,建议并应用了基于生态的区域级田地等级。在这里,我们评估方案。平均而言,有40%的补贴领域在排名的前5%中,有80%在前20%的范围内。与分层随机选择非补贴牧场相比,补贴牧场上的鹅放牧压力高13倍,尽管补贴的田地仅占草地面积的13%,但仍捕获了67%的牧场饲喂鹅。科学家与管理人员之间的密切对话被认为是该计划成功的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号