首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Manual Manipulative Therapy >Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain in Adults Treated by Manual Therapy: A Systematic Review of Change Scores in Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Session
【2h】

Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain in Adults Treated by Manual Therapy: A Systematic Review of Change Scores in Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Session

机译:成人慢性机械性颈痛通过手动疗法治疗:单次随机对照试验中变化评分的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report a systematic analysis of group change scores of subjects with chronic neck pain not due to whiplash and without headache or arm pain, in randomized clinical trials of a single session of manual therapy. A comprehensive literature search of clinical trials of chronic neck pain treated with manual therapies up to December 2006 was conducted. Trials that scored above 60% on the PEDro Scale were included. Change scores were analyzed for absolute, percentage change and effect size (ES) whenever possible. Nine trials were identified: 6 for spinal manipulation, 4 for spinal mobilization or non-manipulative manual therapy (2 overlapping trials), and 1 trial using ischemic compression. No trials were identified for massage therapy or manual traction. Four manipulation trials (five groups) reported mean immediate changes in 100-mm VAS of −18.94 (9.28) mm. ES for these changes ranged from .33 to 2.3. Two mobilization trials reported immediate VAS changes of −11.5 and −4 mm (ES of .36 and .22, respectively); one trial reported no difference in immediate pain scores versus sham mobilization. The ischemic compression study showed statistically significant immediate decreases in 100-mm pain VAS (average = −14.6 mm). There is moderate-to-high quality evidence that immediate clinically important improvements are obtained from a single session of spinal manipulation. The evidence for mobilization is less substantial, with fewer studies reporting smaller immediate changes. There is insufficient evidence for ischemic compression to draw conclusions. There is no evidence for a single session of massage or manual traction for chronic neck pain.
机译:我们报告了单次手动治疗的随机临床试验中患有慢性颈痛的受试者的组变化评分的系统分析,这些受试者不是由于鞭打引起的,没有头痛或手臂疼痛。进行了一项综合文献,对直到2006年12月为止通过手法治疗慢性颈痛的临床试验进行了研究。纳入在PEDro量表上得分超过60%的试验。尽可能分析变化分数的绝对值,变化百分比和效应大小(ES)。确定了9项试验:6项用于脊柱操纵,4项用于脊柱动员或非操纵性手动疗法(2项重叠试验)和1项使用缺血性加压的试验。尚未确定按摩疗法或手动牵引的试验。四个操作试验(五个组)报告了100毫米VAS的平均立即变化为-18.94(9.28)毫米。这些变化的ES范围从.33到2.3。两项动员试验报告,VAS立即变化为-11.5和-4 mm(ES分别为0.36和.22);一项试验报告,即刻疼痛评分与假手术动员没有差异。缺血性压迫研究显示100毫米疼痛VAS的即时显着减少(平均= -14.6毫米)。有中等到高质量的证据表明,从一次脊柱操作中就可以立即获得临床上重要的改善。动员的证据较少,较少的研究报告了较小的即时变化。没有足够的证据证明局部缺血可以得出结论。没有证据表明对慢性颈部疼痛进行一次按摩或手动牵引即可。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号