首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Public Health Ethics >The Restaurant Food Hot Potato: Stop Passing it on—A Commentary on Mah and Timming’s ‘Equity in Public Health Ethics: The Case of Menu Labelling Policy at the Local Level’
【2h】

The Restaurant Food Hot Potato: Stop Passing it on—A Commentary on Mah and Timming’s ‘Equity in Public Health Ethics: The Case of Menu Labelling Policy at the Local Level’

机译:餐厅食品土豆:不要继续传播下去-评Mah和Timming的公共卫生道德平等:地方菜单标签政策的案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the case discussion, ‘Equity in Public Health Ethics: The Case of Menu Labelling Policy at the Local Level’ (2014), Mah and Timming state that menu labelling would ‘place requirements for information disclosure on private sector food businesses, which, as a policy instrument, is arguably less intrusive than related activities such as requiring changes to the food content’. In this commentary on Mah and Timming’s case study, I focus on discussing how menu-labelling policy permits governments to avoid addressing the heart of the problem, which is high-calorie, high-sodium restaurant food. Menu labelling policy does not address food content in a way that is meaningful for change, instead relying on individuals to change their behaviour given new information. Besides having questionable efficacy, this raises concerns about moralizing food choices.
机译:在案例讨论中,“公共卫生道德中的平等:地方菜单标签政策的案例”(2014年)中,Mah和Timming指出,菜单标签将“对私营部门食品企业的信息披露提出要求。政策工具可以说比相关活动(如要求改变食品含量)的干扰少。在有关Mah和Timming案例研究的评论中,我重点讨论菜单标签政策如何使政府避免解决问题的核心,即高热量,高钠的餐厅食品。菜单标签政策并未以有意义的方式处理食物中的内容,而是依靠个人根据新信息来改变其行为。除了效果不佳外,这还引起人们对食物选择道德化的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号