首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Public Health Ethics >How do ‘Public’ Values Influence Individual Health Behaviour? An Empirical-Normative Analysis of Young Men’s Discourse Regarding HIV Testing Practices
【2h】

How do ‘Public’ Values Influence Individual Health Behaviour? An Empirical-Normative Analysis of Young Men’s Discourse Regarding HIV Testing Practices

机译:公共价值观如何影响个人的健康行为?青年关于艾滋病毒检测实践的话语的经验-规范分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Philosophical arguments stemming from the public health ethics arena suggest that public health interventions ought to be subject to normative inquiry that considers relational values, including concepts such as solidarity, reciprocity and health equity. As yet, however, the extent to which ‘public’ values influence the ‘autonomous’ decisions of the public remains largely unexplored. Drawing on interviews with 50 men in Vancouver, Canada, this study employs a critical discourse analysis to examine participants’ decisions and motivations to voluntarily access HIV testing and/or to accept a routine HIV test offer. Within a sub-set of interviews, a transactional discourse emerged in which the decision to test features an arrangement of ‘giving and receiving’. Discourses related to notions of solidarity emphasize considerations of justice and positions testing as a ‘public’ act. Lastly, ‘individualistic’ discourses focused on individual-level considerations, with less concern for the broader public ‘good’. These findings underscore how normative dimensions pertaining to men’s decisions to test are dialectically interrelated with the broader social and structural influences on individual and collective health-related behaviour, thereby suggesting a need to advance an explicit empirical-normative research agenda related to population and public health intervention research.
机译:来自公共卫生伦理学领域的哲学观点表明,公共卫生干预措施应接受规范性的询问,并考虑关系价值,包括团结,互惠和健康公平等概念。然而,到目前为止,“公共”价值观在多大程度上影响着公众的“自治”决定仍未得到充分探索。这项研究基于对加拿大温哥华市50名男性的访谈,运用批判性话语分析来研究参与者自愿接受HIV检测和/或接受常规HIV检测的决定和动机。在一组子访谈中,出现了一种交易性话语,其中测试的决定采用了“给予和接受”的安排。与团结概念相关的论述强调将正义和立场测试视为“公共”行为。最后,“个人主义”论述着重于个人层面的考虑,而较少关注更广泛的公众“善”。这些发现强调了与男性测试决定有关的规范维度与对个人和集体健康相关行为的更广泛的社会和结构影响之间存在辩证关系,从而表明有必要推进与人口和公共卫生相关的明确的经验-规范研究议程干预研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号