首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Public Health Ethics >Analysis of the Paternalistic Justification of an Agenda Setting Public Health Policy: The Case of Tobacco Plain Packaging
【2h】

Analysis of the Paternalistic Justification of an Agenda Setting Public Health Policy: The Case of Tobacco Plain Packaging

机译:制定公共卫生政策议程的家长式论证分析:以烟草无装饰包装为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article analyses the paternalistic justification of the world’s first mandatory tobacco plain packaging policy, which came into force in Australia in 2012. The policy is setting international precedence, with a range of developed and developing countries planning and implementing similar policies. Understanding the paternalistic dimension of the policy is therefore of imminent international importance. The policy meets important ethical benchmarks such as respect for citizens’ self-interests and protection of others against harm. However, plain packaging faces a number of ethical challenges: the policy is a controversial type of paternalism; it runs partially against the harm principle; and it fails to meet key operational criteria.
机译:本文分析了2012年在澳大利亚生效的世界上第一个强制性烟草无装饰包装政策的家长式论证。该政策正在确立国际优先地位,许多发达国家和发展中国家都在计划和实施类似的政策。因此,了解该政策的家长式意义在国际上具有重要意义。该政策符合重要的道德基准,例如尊重公民的自身利益和保护他人免受伤害。但是,无装饰包装面临着许多道德挑战:该政策是一种有争议的家长制。它部分地违反了伤害原则;并且它不符合关键操作标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号