首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Public Health Ethics >The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak
【2h】

The Acceptability of Online Consent in a Self-Test Serosurvey of Responders to the 2014–2016 West African Ebola Outbreak

机译:对2014-2016年西非埃博拉疫情爆发的响应者进行自我测试血清调查时在线同意的可接受性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Online participation in research is used increasingly to recruit geographically dispersed populations. Obtaining online consent is convenient, yet we know little about the acceptability of this practice. We carried out a serostudy among personnel returning to the UK/Ireland following deployment to West Africa during the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic. We used an online procedure for consenting returnees and designed a small descriptive study to understand: how much of the consent material they read, how informed they felt and if they preferred online to traditional face-to-face consent. Of 261 returnees, 111 (43 per cent) completed the consent survey. Participants indicated a high level of engagement with the consent materials, with 67 per cent reporting having read all and 20 per cent having read ‘most’ of the materials. All participants indicated feeling completely (78 per cent) or mostly (22 per cent) informed about the purpose, methods and intended uses of the research, as well as what participation was required and what risks were involved. Only three participants indicated a preference for face-to-face consent. Free-text comments suggested that online consent may be an acceptable modality for uncomplicated and low-risk studies. The study sample was largely composed of health professionals, suggesting acceptability of online consent within this population.
机译:在线参与研究被越来越多地用来招募地理上分散的人群。获得在线同意很方便,但是我们对这种做法的可接受性知之甚少。我们对2014-2016年埃博拉疫情期间部署到西非后返回英国/爱尔兰的人员进行了评估。我们使用了在线程序来征集同意的返回者,并设计了一个小规模的描述性研究,以了解:他们阅读了多少同意材料,感觉如何,以及他们是否更喜欢在线面对传统的面对面同意。在261名返回者中,有111名(43%)完成了同意调查。与会人员表示,他们对同意书的参与度很高,有67%的人阅读了全部内容,有20%的人阅读了“大部分”材料。所有参与者都表示完全了解(78%)或大部分(22%)了解了研究的目的,方法和预期用途,以及需要进行哪些参与和涉及哪些风险。只有三名参与者表示倾向于面对面同意。自由文本评论表明,对于简单且低风险的研究,在线同意可能是一种可接受的方式。该研究样本主要由卫生专业人员组成,表明该人群中在线同意的可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号