首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Two kinds of common prenatal screening tests for Down’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Two kinds of common prenatal screening tests for Down’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:唐氏综合症的两种常见的产前筛查测试:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the chromosomal examination of foetal cells for the prenatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome (DS) carries a risk of inducing miscarriage, serum screening tests are commonly used before invasive procedures. In this study, a total of 374 records from PubMed, EMBASE, and the ISI Science Citation Index databases were reviewed. As a result of duplication, insufficient data, and inappropriate article types, 18 independent articles containing 183,998 samples were used in the final systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the serum triple screening test (STS) and the integrated screening test (INS). Data extracted from the selected studies were statistically analysed, and the presence of heterogeneity and publication bias was assessed using specific software. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and the area under the curve for the STS were 0.77 (95% confidence interval = 0.73–0.81), 0.94 (0.94–0.94), 9.78 (6.87–13.93), 0.26 (0.22–0.31), 44.72 (30.77–65.01), and 0.9064, respectively. For the INS, these values were 0.93 (0.90–0.95), 0.93 (0.93–0.93), 22.38 (12.47–40.14), 0.08 (0.05–0.11), 289.81 (169.08–496.76), and 0.9781, respectively. These results indicate that the INS exhibits better diagnostic value for DS. However, further research is needed to identify other biomarkers to improve prenatal screening tests.
机译:由于胎儿细胞进行染色体检查以进行唐氏综合症(DS)的产前诊断有引起流产的风险,因此在侵入性手术之前通常使用血清筛查试验。在这项研究中,对来自PubMed,EMBASE和ISI科学引文索引数据库的374条记录进行了回顾。由于重复,数据不足和不适当的文章类型,最终对18种独立的文章(共183,998个样本)进行了血清三重筛查测试(STS)和综合筛查测试(STS)的诊断性能的最终系统评价和荟萃分析( INS)。对从所选研究中提取的数据进行统计分析,并使用特定软件评估异质性和发表偏倚的存在。 STS的整体敏感性,特异性,阳性似然比,阴性似然比,诊断比值比和曲线下面积分别为0.77(95%置信区间= 0.73-0.81),0.94(0.94-0.94),9.78(6.87) –13.93),0.26(0.22-0.31),44.72(30.77–65.01)和0.9064。对于INS,这些值分别为0.93(0.90-0.95),0.93(0.93-0.93),22.38(12.47-40.14),0.08(0.05-0.11),289.81(169.08-496.76)和0.9781。这些结果表明INS对DS具有更好的诊断价值。但是,需要进一步的研究来鉴定其他生物标志物,以改善产前筛查测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号