首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield purity and downstream applications
【2h】

Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield purity and downstream applications

机译:使用培养上清液进行外泌体分离方法的比较分析以获得最佳产量纯度和下游应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the efficacy of four kits from Invitrogen, 101Bio, Wako and iZON along with conventional ultracentrifugation-based method for exosome yield, purity and quality. Cell culture supernatant was used as an abundant source of exosomes, and exosome quantity, size-distribution, zeta-potential, marker-expression and RNA/protein quality were determined. The Invitrogen kit gave the highest yield but the preparation showed broader size-distribution likely due to microvesicle co-precipitation and had the least dispersion stability. Other preparations showed <150 nm size range and good stability. Preparation from iZON column; however, had a broader size-distribution in the lower size range suggestive of some impurities of non-vesicular aggregates. RNA quality from all preparations was comparable; however, proteins from Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation showed polyethylene glycol (PEG) contamination in mass spectrometry. Chemical impurities from the precipitant could also be the cause of toxicity of Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation in biological growth measurement assay. Together, these findings should serve as a guide to choose and further optimize exosome isolation methods for their desired downstream applications.
机译:外来体因其在病理生物学过程中的作用而受到广泛关注,并且正在被探索为疾病诊断和管理的工具。因此,已经开发了基于不同原理的各种分离方法用于外来体分离。在这里,我们比较了来自Invitrogen,101Bio,Wako和iZON的四种试剂盒以及传统的基于超速离心的方法的外泌体产量,纯度和质量的功效。细胞培养上清液被用作外泌体的丰富来源,并测定了外泌体的数量,大小分布,ζ电位,标志物表达和RNA /蛋白质质量。 Invitrogen试剂盒收率最高,但由于微泡共沉淀,制剂显示出更宽的尺寸分布,并且分散稳定性最低。其他制剂显示<150 nm的粒径范围和良好的稳定性。从iZON柱进行制备;然而,在较低尺寸范围内具有较宽的尺寸分布,这表明非水泡聚集体存在一些杂质。所有制备物中的RNA质量均相当;但是,基于Invitrogen方法的外泌体制备物中的蛋白质在质谱中显示出聚乙二醇(PEG)污染。沉淀剂中的化学杂质也可能是基于Invitrogen方法的外泌体制剂在生物生长测量分析中产生毒性的原因。总之,这些发现应作为选择和进一步优化外泌体分离方法以用于其所需下游应用的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号