首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics >Ethical reflection on the harm in reproductive decision‐making
【2h】

Ethical reflection on the harm in reproductive decision‐making

机译:关于生殖决策危害的伦理思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Advances in reproductive technologies continue to present ethical problems concerning their implementation and use. These advances have preoccupied bioethicists in their bid to gauge our moral responsibilities and obligations when making reproductive decisions. The aim of this discussion is to highlight the importance of a sensibility to differences in moral perspective as part of our ethical inquiry in these matters. Its focal point is the work of John Harris, who has consistently addressed the ethical issues raised by advancing reproductive technologies. The discussion is aimed at a central tenet of Harris's position on reproductive decision‐making—namely, that in some instances, giving birth to a worthwhile life may cause harm and will therefore be morally wrong. It attempts to spell out some of the implications of Harris's position that the author takes to involve a misplaced generality. To support this claim, some examples are explored that demonstrate the variety of ways in which concepts (such as harm) may manifest themselves as moral considerations within the context of reproductive decision‐making. The purpose is to demonstrate that Harris's general conception of the moral limits of reproductive autonomy obscures the issues raised by particular cases, which in themselves may reveal important directions for our ethical inquiry.
机译:生殖技术的进步继续带来有关其实施和使用的伦理问题。这些进步使生物伦理学家全神贯注于在做出生殖决定时评估我们的道德责任和义务。讨论的目的是强调对道德观念差异的敏感性的重要性,这是我们在这些问题上进行道德探究的一部分。它的重点是约翰·哈里斯(John Harris)的工作,他一直致力于解决由于生殖技术发展而引起的伦理问题。讨论的目的是哈里斯在生殖决策上的立场的中心原则,即,在某些情况下,生育有价值的生活可能会造成伤害,因此在道德上是错误的。它试图阐明哈里斯(Harris)的立场所涉及的一些隐含含义,即作者误以为是错误的普遍性。为了支持这一主张,研究了一些实例,这些实例说明了在生殖决策的背景下,各种概念(例如伤害)可以作为道德考量体现出来的各种方式。目的是证明哈里斯(Harris)对生殖自治的道德极限的一般概念掩盖了特定案例所提出的问题,这些问题本身可能会揭示我们进行道德探究的重要方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号