首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>LGBT Health >Specialty Choice Among Sexual and Gender Minorities in Medicine: The Role of Specialty Prestige Perceived Inclusion and Medical School Climate
【2h】

Specialty Choice Among Sexual and Gender Minorities in Medicine: The Role of Specialty Prestige Perceived Inclusion and Medical School Climate

机译:医学上的性别少数群体和性别少数群体中的专业选择:专业声望感知的包容性和医学院环境的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: Sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) in medicine experience unique stressors in training. However, little is known about SGM specialty choice. This study examined predictors of SGM specialty choice, associations between specialty prestige and perceived SGM inclusion, and self-reported influences on specialty choice.>Methods: Medical trainees and practitioners (358 SGM, 1528 non-SGM) were surveyed online. We operationalized specialty choice at the individual level as respondents' specialty of practice; at the specialty level, as a percentage of SGM respondents in each specialty. We examined specialty prestige, perceived SGM inclusivity, and medical school climate as predictors of SGM specialty choice, and we compared additional influences on specialty choice between SGM and non-SGM.>Results: The percentage of SGM in each specialty was inversely related to specialty prestige (P = 0.001) and positively related to perceived SGM inclusivity (P = 0.01). Prestigious specialties were perceived as less SGM inclusive (P < 0.001). Medical school climate did not predict specialty prestige (P = 0.82). SGM were more likely than non-SGM to indicate that sexual and gender identity strongly influenced specialty choice (P < 0.01). SGM most frequently rated personality fit, specialty content, role models, and work–life balance as strong influences on specialty choice. Exposure as a medical student to SGM faculty did not predict specialty prestige among SGM.>Conclusion: Specialty prestige and perceived inclusivity predict SGM specialty choice. SGM diversity initiatives in prestigious specialties may be particularly effective by addressing SGM inclusion directly. Further research is needed to inform effective mentorship for SGM medical students. Exposure to SGM in medical training reduces anti-SGM bias among medical professionals, and SGM in medicine often assume leadership roles in clinical care, education, and research regarding SGM health. Supporting and promoting SGM diversity across the spectrum of medical specialties, therefore, represents a critical avenue to improve the care delivered to SGM populations and addresses the role of providers in the health disparities experienced by SGM.
机译:>目的:医学界的性少数和性别少数群体(SGM)在训练中会遇到独特的压力。但是,关于SGM专业选择知之甚少。这项研究检查了SGM专业选择的预测因素,专业声望与SGM感知包容性之间的关联以及自我报告对专业选择的影响。>方法:医学实习生和执业医师(358名SGM,1528名非SGM)为在线调查。我们将个人选择的专业选择作为受访者的实践专业;在专业级别,占每个专业中SGM受访者的百分比。我们研究了专业声誉,感知的SGM包容性和医学院环境作为SGM专业选择的预测因素,并比较了SGM和非SGM之间对专业选择的其他影响。>结果:专业与专业声望成反比(Pverse = 0.001),与感知的SGM包容性呈正相关(P = 0.01)。享有声望的专业被认为不包括SGM(P <0.001)。医学院的气候不能预测专业声望(P = 0.82)。 SGM比非SGM更可能表明性和性别认同强烈影响专业选择(P <0.01)。 SGM最常将个性适合度,专业内容,榜样和工作与生活的平衡评价为对专业选择的强烈影响。作为SGM教授的医学生,并不能预测SGM的专业声誉。>结论:专业声誉和包容性可以预测SGM的专业选择。通过直接解决将SGM纳入其中的问题,享有声望的专业中的SGM多样性举措可能会特别有效。需要进一步的研究来为SGM医学生提供有效的指导。在医学培训中接触SGM可以减少医学专业人员对SGM的偏见,并且SGM在医学中通常在SGM健康的临床护理,教育和研究中起领导作用。因此,在整个医学专科领域中支持和促进SGM多样性是改善为SGM人群提供医疗服务的关键途径,并解决了提供者在SGM所经历的健康差异中的作用。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 LGBT Health
  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 -1(3),6
  • 年度 -1
  • 页码 451–460
  • 总页数 10
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-21 10:53:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号