首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine >Efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy plus umbilical cord blood infusion in severe aplastic anemia patients: A cohort study
【2h】

Efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy plus umbilical cord blood infusion in severe aplastic anemia patients: A cohort study

机译:联合免疫抑制疗法加脐带血输注治疗严重再生障碍性贫血患者的疗效和安全性:一项队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy (IST) plus umbilical cord blood infusion (UCBI) in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. A total of 68 patients with SAA were enrolled in the current prospective cohort study and divided into the IST (n=35; positive control) and IST+UCBI (n=33; experimental) groups according to the treatment conditions. Patients in the IST group were treated with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg through intravenous infusion once a day for five days. This was combined with oral cyclosporine A (CsA) at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg twice a day for 2 years. Patients in the IST+UBCI group were treated with r-ATG and CsA at the same doses and frequencies as the IST group plus one UCBI 1 day after the final treatment with r-ATG. At 6 months post treatment, the complete response and overall response rate (ORR) of the IST+UCBI group were markedly higher compared with those in the IST group. Furthermore, patients in the IST+UCBI group achieved absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet count responses more rapidly as compared with the IST group. However, no difference in the hemoglobin (Hb) response was identified between the two groups. In addition, SAA patients achieved responses in the ANC and platelet count more rapidly in comparison with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA) patients, while the number of days to Hb responses were similar in the SAA and VSAA patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed that IST+UCBI treatment was an independent predicting factor for patients achieving complete response or partial response, whereas VSAA was an independent predictor of a worse ORR. Platelet and reticulocyte were also independent predicting factors. Finally, the survival of patients was similar between the groups, and no difference in the safety of the treatment was observed. In conclusion, combined IST plus UCBI treatment may be applied as an effective and safe therapy for SAA patients.
机译:本研究旨在评估在严重再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者中联合应用免疫抑制疗法(IST)和脐带血输注(UCBI)的疗效和安全性。共有68名SAA患者参加了当前的前瞻性队列研究,并根据治疗情况分为IST组(n = 35;阳性对照)和IST + UCBI组(n = 33;实验组)。 IST组的患者每天通过静脉输注2.5 mg / kg的兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(r-ATG)进行治疗,持续5天。将其与口服环孢素A(CsA)合并,剂量为3-5 mg / kg,每天两次,连续2年。 IST + UBCI组的患者以与IST组相同的剂量和频率接受r-ATG和CsA的治疗,并在最后一次用r-ATG治疗后1天服用UCBI。治疗后6个月,IST + UCBI组的完全缓解和总体缓解率(ORR)显着高于IST组。此外,与IST组相比,IST + UCBI组的患者中性粒细胞绝对计数(ANC)和血小板计数反应更快。但是,两组之间没有发现血红蛋白(Hb)反应的差异。此外,与非常严重的再生障碍性贫血(VSAA)患者相比,SAA患者在ANC中获得的反应更快,血小板计数更快,而SAA和VSAA患者中Hb反应的天数相似。多元logistic回归分析还显示,IST + UCBI治疗是患者完全缓解或部分缓解的独立预测因素,而VSAA是ORR恶化的独立预测因素。血小板和网状细胞也是独立的预测因素。最后,两组之间患者的存活率相似,并且在治疗安全性方面未观察到差异。总之,IST加UCBI联合治疗可作为SAA患者的安全有效治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号