首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America >Field Evaluation of Capillary Blood Samples as a Collection Specimen for the Rapid Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Infection During an Outbreak Emergency
【2h】

Field Evaluation of Capillary Blood Samples as a Collection Specimen for the Rapid Diagnosis of Ebola Virus Infection During an Outbreak Emergency

机译:现场评估毛细管血样作为暴发紧急情况期间快速诊断埃博拉病毒感染的采集标本

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Reliable reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)–based diagnosis of Ebola virus infection currently requires a blood sample obtained by intravenous puncture. During the current Ebola outbreak in Guinea, we evaluated the usability of capillary blood samples collected from fingersticks of patients suspected of having Ebola virus disease (EVD) for field diagnostics during an outbreak emergency.>Methods. A total of 120 venous and capillary blood samples were collected from 53 patients admitted to the Ebola Treatment Centre in Guéckédou, Guinea, between July and August 2014. All sample specimens were analyzed by RT-PCR using the RealStar Filovirus Screen RT-PCR Kit 1.0 from altona Diagnostics (Germany). We compared samples obtained by venipuncture and those obtained by capillary blood sampling absorbed onto swab devices.>Results. The resulting sensitivity and specificity of tests performed with capillary blood samples were 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.9%–95.6%; 33/38 patients) and 100% (95% CI, 84.6%–100%; 22/22 patients), respectively.>Conclusions. Our data suggest that capillary blood samples could serve as an alternative to venous blood samples for the diagnosis of EVD in resource-limited settings during a crisis. This can be of particular advantage in cases when venipuncture is difficult to perform—for example, with newborns and infants or when adult patients reject venipuncture for cultural or religious reasons.
机译:>背景。基于可靠的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的埃博拉病毒感染诊断目前需要通过静脉穿刺获得血液样本。在当前的几内亚埃博拉疫情暴发期间,我们评估了从疑似埃博拉病毒病(EVD)患者的指尖采集的毛细血管血样在暴发紧急情况下进行现场诊断的可用性。>方法。 2014年7月至8月之间,从几内亚Guéckédou埃博拉治疗中心收治的53例患者中收集了120份静脉和毛细血管血样。所有样品样本均通过RT-PCR进行了分析,使用了来自Altona Diagnostics的RealStar Filovirus Screen RT-PCR Kit 1.0 (德国)。我们比较了通过静脉穿刺获得的样本和吸收到拭子设备上的毛细管血液采样所得的样本。>结果。使用毛细管血液样本进行的检测的灵敏度和特异性为86.8%(95%置信区间[CI]) ,分别为71.9%–95.6%; 33/38例)和100%(95%CI,84.6%–100%; 22/22例)。>结论。我们的数据表明毛细血管血样可以在危机期间在资源有限的情况下代替静脉血样本来诊断EVD。在难以进行静脉穿刺的情况下(例如新生儿和婴儿)或成年患者出于文化或宗教原因拒绝静脉穿刺的情况下,这可能会特别有利。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号