首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH >Comparative evaluation of Shear bond strength ofdifferent Pit and fissure Sealants in Primary and Permanent teeth -An In-Vitro Study
【2h】

Comparative evaluation of Shear bond strength ofdifferent Pit and fissure Sealants in Primary and Permanent teeth -An In-Vitro Study

机译:剪切强度的比较评价乳牙和恒牙的不同凹坑和裂隙密封剂-体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Dental caries among children is one of the greatest challenges faced by dentists globally; especially that of susceptible surfaces like the Pit and fissures. Dental sealants have proved to be an effective way to prevent caries development. The Clinical success of any material depends upon its adhesion to tooth structure, resistance to wear and ability to withstand the masticatory or occlusal forces. Hence it is important to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS). The Present study’s aim was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of different pit and fissure sealants placed on Primary molars and Permanent Premolars. >Materials & Methods: Sixty noncarious extracted teeth comprising of thirty Primary molars and thirty Permanent Premolars were divided into four groups of 15 each. The buccal surfaces of all teeth were dried, etched and the etched surfaces of Primary molars (Group I) and PermanentPremolars (Group III) were placed with Helioseal-F while Groups IIand IV, that included Primary molars and Permanent Premolarsreceived Clinpro. Shear bond strength was evaluated and the meanwas obtained for all the groups. The results were analyzed usingtwoway analysis of variance followed by Tukeys post hoc procedureto check for significant differences.>Results:The specimens of unfilled sealant Clinpro (Groups II & IV)showed higher Shear bond strength when compared to the specimens offilled sealant Helioseal-F (Groups I & III).>Conclusion:The unfilled sealant showed a better Shear bond strength comparedto the filled sealant. The bond strength in Primary molars wasslightly higher compared to Permanent Premolars.>How to cite the article:Pushpalatha HM, Ravichandra KS, Srikanth K, Divya G, Done V,Krishna KB, Patil V. Comparative evaluation of Shear bond strengthof different Pit and fissure Sealants in Primary and Permanentteeth - An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(2):84-9.
机译:>背景:儿童龋齿是全球牙医所面临的最大挑战之一;尤其是易受腐蚀的表面,例如坑和裂缝。牙科密封剂已被证明是预防龋齿发展的有效方法。任何材料的临床成功取决于其对牙齿结构的附着力,耐磨性以及承受咀嚼或咬合力的能力。因此,评估剪切粘结强度(SBS)很重要。本研究的目的是评估和比较放置在主磨牙和永久磨牙上的不同凹坑和裂隙密封胶的剪切粘结强度。 >材料与方法:将60颗由30颗初级磨牙和30颗永久性前磨牙组成的非龋齿拔出,分为四组,每组15个。将所有牙齿的颊面干燥,蚀刻,并将第一磨牙(I组)和永久磨牙的蚀刻表面前磨牙(III组)放置有Helioseal-F,而II组和IV,包括初级磨牙和永久性前磨牙收到Clinpro。评估剪切粘结强度并计算平均值获得了所有组。使用以下方法分析结果双向分析方差分析,然后采用Tukeys事后程序检查是否有明显差异。>结果:未填充密封剂Clinpro的样品(第II和IV组)与试样相比,具有更高的剪切粘结强度填充的密封剂Helioseal-F(I和III组)。>结论:与未填充的密封胶相比,其剪切强度更高填充的密封胶。初级磨牙的粘结强度为比永久性前磨牙略高。>如何引用该文章:Pushpalatha HM,Ravichandra KS,Srikanth K,Divya G,Done V,Krishna KB,Patil V.剪切粘结强度的比较评估和永久的不同坑和缝隙密封剂的种类牙齿-体外研究。国际口腔卫生杂志2014; 6(2):84-9。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号