首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Orthopaedica >Measurement properties of the OARSI core set of performance-based measures for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study on reliability construct validity and responsiveness in 90 hip osteo­arthritis patients
【2h】

Measurement properties of the OARSI core set of performance-based measures for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study on reliability construct validity and responsiveness in 90 hip osteo­arthritis patients

机译:OARSI基于性能的核心指标对髋骨关节炎的测量特性:一项针对90名髋骨关节炎患者的信度结构效度和反应性的前瞻性队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose — Improvement of physical function is one of the main treatment goals in severe hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. The Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) has identified a core set of performance-based tests to assess the construct physical function: 30-s chair stand test (30-s CST), 4x10-meter fast-paced walk test (40 m FPWT), and a stair-climb test. Despite this recommendation, available evidence on the measurement properties is limited. We evaluated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of these performance-based measures in patients with hip OA scheduled for total hip arthroplasty (THA).Patients and methods — Baseline and 12-month follow-up measurements were prospectively obtained in 90 end-stage hip OA patients who underwent THA. As there is no gold standard for comparison, the hypothesis testing method was used for construct validity and responsiveness analysis. A test can be assumed valid if ≥75% of predefined hypotheses are confirmed. A subgroup (n = 30) underwent test–retest measurements for reliability analysis. The Oxford Hip Score, Hip injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score—Physical Function Short Form, pain during activity score, and muscle strength were used as comparator instruments.Results — Test–retest reliability was appropriate; intraclass correlation coefficient values exceeded 0.70 for all 3 tests. None of the performance-based measures reached 75% hypothesis confirmation for the construct validity or responsiveness analysis.Interpretation — The performance-based tests have good reliability in the assessment of physical function. Construct validity and responsiveness, using patient-reported measures and muscle strength as comparator instruments, could not be confirmed. Therefore, our findings do not justify their use for clinical practice.
机译:背景与目的—身体功能的改善是重度髋骨关节炎(OA)患者的主要治疗目标之一。国际骨关节炎研究协会(OARSI)已经确定了一套基于性能的核心测试,以评估构造物的物理功能:30秒的座椅站立测试(CST为30秒),4x10米的快步行走测试(40 m FPWT) )和爬楼梯测试。尽管有此建议,但有关测量属性的可用证据仍然有限。我们评估了这些以性能为基础的措施在计划进行全髋关节置换术(THA)的髋关节OA患者中的可靠性,有效性和反应性。患者和方法—前瞻性地在90个晚期获得基线和12个月的随访测量进行过THA的髋关节OA患者。由于没有用于比较的黄金标准,因此使用假设检验方法进行结构有效性和响应性分析。如果确认≥75%的预定义假设,则该测试可以被认为是有效的。一个亚组(n = 30)进行了重新测试,以进行可靠性分析。牛津髋关节评分,髋关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分—身体机能简写,活动中的疼痛评分和肌肉力量被用作比较器。结果—重测信度是适当的;所有3个测试的组内相关系数值均超过0.70。基于绩效的测试均未达到75%的假设确认,可用于结构效度或响应性分析。解释—基于绩效的测试在评估身体机能方面具有良好的可靠性。使用患者报告的措施和肌肉力量作为比较工具,无法确定构建的有效性和反应性。因此,我们的发现不能证明其可用于临床实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号