首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine >A Cross-sectional Analysis of Motivation and Decision Making inReferrals to Lifestyle Interventions by Primary Care General Practitioners: ACall for Guidance
【2h】

A Cross-sectional Analysis of Motivation and Decision Making inReferrals to Lifestyle Interventions by Primary Care General Practitioners: ACall for Guidance

机译:企业动机和决策的横断面分析初级保健全科医生转介的生活方式干预:A征求指导

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim. To explore (1) general practitioners’ (GPs’) motivations to refer to lifestyle interventions and to investigate the association between GPs’ own lifestyle behaviors and their referral behavior and (2) patient indicators in the decision-making process of the GPs’ referral to lifestyle interventions. Method. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 99 Dutch primary care GPs. Their motivation to refer was assessed by beliefs regarding lifestyle interventions. GPs’ referral behaviors were assessed—considering referral and self-reported actual referral—as well as their own lifestyle behaviors (physical activity, dieting, being overweight). Decision making regarding referring patients to lifestyle interventions was assessed by imposed patient indicators, spontaneously suggested decisive patient indicators, and case-based referring (vignettes). Results. A substantial group of GPs was not motivated for referral to lifestyle interventions. GPs’ referral behavior was significantly associated with their perceived subjective norm, behavioral control, and their own physical activity and diet. Most important, patient indicators in referral to lifestyle interventions were somatic indicators and patients’ motivation for lifestyle interventions. Conclusions. GPs’ motivation and referral behavior might beimproved by providing them with tailored resources about evidence-basedlifestyle interventions, with support from allied health professionals and withofficial guidelines for a more objective and systematic screening ofpatients.
机译:目标。探索(1)全科医生参考生活方式干预的动机,并调查GP自己的生活方式行为与其转诊行为之间的关联,以及(2)GP转诊决策过程中的患者指标进行生活方式干预。方法。在99个荷兰初级保健GP中进行了横断面研究。他们的推荐动机是通过有关生活方式干预的信念进行评估的。对全科医生的推荐行为进行了评估(考虑了推荐和自我报告的实际推荐)以及他们自己的生活方式行为(体育活动,饮食,超重)。通过强加的患者指标,自发建议的决定性患者指标和基于案例的参考(渐晕)来评估有关将患者转为生活方式干预的决策。结果。大量的全科医生没有动机转介生活方式干预。全科医生的推荐行为与他们所感知的主观规范,行为控制以及他们自己的身体活动和饮食密切相关。最重要的是,转介生活方式干预的患者指标是躯体指标和患者进行生活方式干预的动机。结论。全科医生的动机和推荐行为可能是通过为他们提供有关基于证据的量身定制的资源来改进生活方式干预,在相关医疗专业人员的支持下以及更加客观和系统地筛查官方指南耐心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号