首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Building an Ontology for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment to Allow Data Sharing and Comparisons Across Hospitals
【2h】

Building an Ontology for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment to Allow Data Sharing and Comparisons Across Hospitals

机译:建立压疮风险评估的本体论以允许跨医院数据共享和比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As a way to promote consistency and completeness of pressure ulcer risk assessment, as well as to establish a framework for data and knowledge sharing in this domain, we constructed an ontology that represents how the characteristics of the high risk patients defined by the Braden scale are operationalized at two different settings. We observed great similarity between the two study hospitals. Forty scenarios that portrayed patients at each site were added to the ontology and algorithmically assessed for pressure ulcer risk using the ontology reasoner FACT++. When validated by manual assessment by the nurses from each site, high consistency in the assessed risk level was observed with the average consistency score of 0.82 (SD= 0.06) out of 1.0. The results suggest that explicitly defining the site specific methods for assessing pressure ulcer risk that comply with the standard methods defined in the Braden scale can improve assessment consistency.
机译:为了促进压疮风险评估的一致性和完整性,并建立该领域的数据和知识共享框架,我们构建了一个本体,该本体代表了由Braden量表定义的高风险患者的特征如何可在两种不同的设置下进行操作。我们观察到两家研究医院之间的相似之处。将描述每个站点的患者的40个场景添加到本体中,并使用本体推理器FACT ++通过算法评估压疮风险。在每个地点的护士通过手动评估进行验证后,观察到的评估风险水平具有高度一致性,平均一致性得分为0.82(SD = 0.06)/ 1.0。结果表明,明确定义符合Braden量表中定义的标准方法的评估压力性溃疡风险的特定地点方法可以改善评估的一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号