首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Increasing Maximum Penalties for Animal Welfare Offences in South Australia—Has It Caused Penal Change?
【2h】

Increasing Maximum Penalties for Animal Welfare Offences in South Australia—Has It Caused Penal Change?

机译:南澳大利亚州对动物福利犯罪的最高刑罚提高了是否已导致刑罚发生变化?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Simple SummaryEvidence suggests that the South Australian public regard the penalties handed down in court for animal abuse as too lenient. Parliament responded to this concern when amending the Animal Welfare Act 1985 (SA), and increased the maximum penalties for animal welfare offences. However, since sentencing information is not readily accessible, it is unknown whether the increases to the maximum penalties in the legislation have caused any changes to the penalties handed down in court. This study investigated this issue by analyzing closed case files gathered from the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SA), to determine the average prison sentence and fine given for animal welfare offences. Fines and prison sentences handed down have doubled in magnitude since Parliament increased the maximum penalties. However, it remains unknown whether these increases to the average penalties are enough to effectively punish animal abusers, and if the general public is content with this outcome.
机译:简单总结证据表明,南澳大利亚州的公众认为对动物虐待的处罚过于宽大。国会在修订1985年动物福利法(SA)时对这种担忧做出了回应,并提高了对动物福利犯罪的最高刑罚。但是,由于量刑信息不易获得,因此尚不清楚立法中最高刑罚的增加是否会导致法庭下达的刑罚发生任何变化。这项研究通过分析从皇家防止虐待动物协会(SA)收集的封闭案卷来调查此问题,以确定对动物福利犯罪的平均监禁刑罚和罚款。自议会提高最高刑罚以来,罚款和监禁的刑罚数量增加了一倍。但是,增加这些平均刑罚是否足以有效惩罚虐待动物者,以及公众是否对这一结果感到满意,仍然是未知的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号