首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Botany >Applicability and Limitations of Optimal Biomass Allocation Models: A Test of Two Species from Fertile and Infertile Habitats
【2h】

Applicability and Limitations of Optimal Biomass Allocation Models: A Test of Two Species from Fertile and Infertile Habitats

机译:最佳生物量分配模型的适用性和局限性:来自可育和不育生境的两种物种的检验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

• Background and Aims The practical applicability of optimal biomass allocation models is not clear. Plants may have constraints in the plasticity of their root : leaf ratio that prevent them from regulating their root : leaf ratio in the optimal manner predicted by the models. The aim of this study was to examine the applicability and limitations of optimal biomass allocation models and to test the assumption that regulation of the root : leaf ratio enables maximization of the relative growth rate (RGR).• Methods Polygonum cuspidatum from an infertile habitat and Chenopodium album from a fertile habitat were grown under a range of nitrogen availabilities. The biomass allocation, leaf nitrogen concentration (LNC), RGR, net assimilation rate (NAR), and leaf area ratio (LAR) of each species were compared with optimal values determined using an optimal biomass allocation model.• Key Results The root : leaf ratio of C. album was smaller than the optimal ratio in the low-nitrogen treatment, while it was almost optimal in the high-nitrogen treatment. In contrast, the root : leaf ratio of P. cuspidatum was close to the optimum under both high- and low-nitrogen conditions. Owing to the optimal regulation of the root : leaf ratio, C. album in the high-nitrogen treatment and P. cuspidatum in both treatments had LNC and RGR (with its two components, NAR and LAR) close to their optima. However, in the low-nitrogen treatment, the suboptimal root : leaf ratio of C. album led to a smaller LNC than the optimum, which in turn resulted in a smaller NAR than the optimum and RGR than the theoretical maximum RGR.• Conclusions The applicability of optimal biomass allocation models is fairly high, although constraints in the plasticity of biomass allocation could prevent optimal regulation of the root : leaf ratio in some species. The assumption that regulation of the root : leaf ratio enables maximization of RGR was supported.
机译:•背景和目标最佳生物量分配模型的实际适用性尚不清楚。植物的根:叶比例可塑性可能受到限制,从而阻止了它们以模型预测的最佳方式调节其根:叶比例。这项研究的目的是检验最佳生物量分配模型的适用性和局限性,并测试对根:叶比例的调节能够使相对生长率(RGR)最大化的假设。•方法来自肥沃的栖息地的藜属植物在一定范围的氮素利用率下生长。将每个物种的生物量分配,叶片氮浓度(LNC),RGR,净同化率(NAR)和叶面积比(LAR)与使用最佳生物量分配模型确定的最佳值进行比较。•主要结果根:叶片在低氮处理中,白僵菌的比率小于最佳比率,而在高氮处理中,其几乎最佳。相反,虎杖的根:叶比在高氮和低氮条件下都接近最佳。由于根:叶比的最佳调节,高氮处理中的C. album和两种处理中的虎杖假单胞菌都具有接近其最佳值的LNC和RGR(及其两个成分,NAR和LAR)。但是,在低氮处理中,C。album的次优根:叶比导致LNC小于最佳值,从而导致NAR小于最佳值,而RGR小于理论最大RGR。•结论最佳生物量分配模型的适用性很高,尽管生物量分配可塑性的限制可能会阻止某些物种的根:叶比的最佳调节。支持对根:叶比例的调节可以使RGR最大化的假设得到支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号