首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Anesthesia Progress >Comparison of Inferior Dental Nerve Block Injections in Child Patients Using 30-Gauge and 25-Gauge Short Needles
【2h】

Comparison of Inferior Dental Nerve Block Injections in Child Patients Using 30-Gauge and 25-Gauge Short Needles

机译:儿童使用30规和25规短针进行下牙神经阻滞注射的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Thirty-gauge needles are generally not recommended by dental schools, yet many dentists use them. Thin needles (30 gauge) can aspirate blood, have similar deflection to thick needles (25 gauge), and resist breakage. Measurable clinical differences between inferior dental block injections using 25-gauge or 30-gauge short needles for children is addressed in this research paper. Random allocation assigned 76 cases to 30-gauge and 62 cases to 25-gauge tribeveled. Twenty-seven-gauge short needles are in routine use for inferior dental nerve block injections in our clinics. After informed written consent was obtained, inferior dental block injections were carefully administered to children (62 males and 76 females, mean age 10 years ± 3 [SD], range 4—18 years) by faculty and students in pediatric dentistry and observed by one of two trained observers. After aspiration in two planes (180°), 0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was deposited in the lingual block area then 1.0 mL in the inferior dental area after touching bone. Any aspirate was recorded and subjective pain scores were taken immediately using a visual analogue scale. Five minutes after the commencement of the injection, the efficacy was tested objectively by two light needle pricks of the mucosa adjacent to the cuspid. The comparability of groups as regards age and sex was verified. Half of the injections were effective at five minutes in each group. There were no significant differences in efficacy, or pain scores. Both 25- and 30-gauge groups had nine instances of slight aspiration and two instances of more marked aspirations. The overall aspiration rate was 16%. It is concluded that 25- and 30-gauge needles do not differ significantly with respect to efficacy, pain, or aspiration. Children do not think that inferior dental nerve block injections hurt very much, and there is no evidence to support a change from 25- to 30-gauge needles.
机译:牙科学校通常不建议使用30号针头,但是许多牙医都在使用它们。细针(30号针头)可以抽吸血液,偏转程度与粗针(25号针头)相似,并且不易断裂。本研究报告解决了使用25号或30号短针对儿童进行的下牙阻滞剂注射之间可测量的临床差异。随机分配将76例分配给30规格,将62例分配给25规格的三角锥。在我们的诊所中,通常使用27号短针进行下牙神经阻滞注射。在获得知情的书面同意后,由教职员工和小儿科学生仔细地对儿童(男62例,女76例,平均年龄10岁±3 [SD],范围4-18岁)进行下牙阻滞注射,并观察一个两名训练有素的观察员。在两个平面(180°)抽吸后,将0.5 mL含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因与舌骨阻滞区沉积在一起,然后在接触牙齿后在下牙区沉积1.0 mL。记录任何抽吸物,并使用视觉模拟量表立即进行主观疼痛评分。注射开始后五分钟,通过与尖牙相邻的两次粘膜轻刺来客观地测试功效。验证了各组在年龄和性别方面的可比性。每组五分钟的注射有效。疗效或疼痛评分无明显差异。 25规格和30规格的组都有9例出现轻微抽吸,而2例则表现出明显的抽吸。总体抽吸率为16%。结论是,25号和30号针头在功效,疼痛或抽吸方面无显着差异。孩子们认为下牙神经阻滞注射不会造成很大的伤害,也没有证据支持将针头从25号改为30号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号