首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Impaction onto a Glass Slide or Agar versus Impingement into a Liquid for the Collection and Recovery of Airborne Microorganisms
【2h】

Impaction onto a Glass Slide or Agar versus Impingement into a Liquid for the Collection and Recovery of Airborne Microorganisms

机译:撞击到载玻片或琼脂上与撞击到液体中以收集和回收空气中的微生物

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To study impaction versus impingement for the collection and recovery of viable airborne microorganisms, three new bioaerosol samplers have been designed and built. They differ from each other by the medium onto which the bioaerosol particles are collected (glass, agar, and liquid) but have the same inlet and collection geometries and the same sampling flow rate. The bioaerosol concentrations recorded by three different collection techniques have been compared with each other: impaction onto a glass slide, impaction onto an agar medium, and impingement into a liquid. It was found that the particle collection efficiency of agar slide impaction depends on the concentration of agar in the collection medium and on the sampling time, when samples are collected on a nonmoving agar slide. Impingement into a liquid showed anomalous behavior with respect to the sampling flow rate. Optimal sampling conditions in which all three new samplers exhibit the same overall sampling efficiency for nonbiological particles have been established. Inlet and collection efficiencies of about 100% have been achieved for all three devices at a sampling flow rate of 10 liters/min. The new agar slide impactor and the new impinger were then used to study the biological factors affecting the overall sampling efficiency. Laboratory experiments on the total recovery of a typical environmental microorganism, Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 13525, showed that both sampling methods, impaction and impingement, provided essentially the same total recovery when relatively nonstressed microorganisms were sampled under optimal sampling conditions. Comparison tests of the newly developed bioaerosol samplers with those commercially available showed that the incorporation of our research findings into the design of the new samplers yields better performance data than data from currently available samplers.
机译:为了研究撞击与撞击对空气中活微生物的收集和回收的影响,已经设计并制造了三种新型生物气溶胶采样器。它们之间的区别在于收集生物气溶胶颗粒的介质(玻璃,琼脂和液体)不同,但具有相同的入口和收集几何形状以及相同的采样流速。已将通过三种不同收集技术记录的生物气溶胶浓度进行了相互比较:撞击在载玻片上,撞击在琼脂培养基上以及撞击在液体中。已经发现,当在不移动的琼脂载玻片上收集样品时,琼脂载玻片撞击的颗粒收集效率取决于收集介质中琼脂的浓度和采样时间。相对于采样流量,撞击到液体中表现出异常行为。已经建立了三个新采样器对非生物颗粒均表现出相同总体采样效率的最佳采样条件。所有三种设备的进样和收集效率均达到了10升/分钟的采样流速。然后使用新的琼脂玻片撞击器和新的冲击器研究影响整体采样效率的生物学因素。对典型环境微生物荧光假单胞菌ATCC 13525的总回收率的实验室实验表明,当在最佳采样条件下对相对无压力的微生物进行采样时,采样方法(撞击和撞击)可提供基本相同的总回收率。对新开发的生物气溶胶采样器与市售采样器的比较测试表明,将我们的研究发现纳入新采样器的设计中,将产生比当前可用采样器更好的性能数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号