首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Behavior Analysis in Practice >Positive Peer Reporting in the Classroom: a Review of Intervention Procedures
【2h】

Positive Peer Reporting in the Classroom: a Review of Intervention Procedures

机译:课堂上积极的同行报告:干预程序的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Positive peer reporting (PPR) is a classroom-based intervention to improve social interactions between students using rewards and positive social attention. Along with a variant of the procedure referred to as “Tootling,” PPR has demonstrated overwhelmingly positive results since its development. However, a unified, standard protocol for successful implementation of PPR interventions has not yet been established. A review of 24 studies, including 48 separately described cases of PPR in classroom settings, provided information concerning adaptations for students in special education, alternative school, and mainstream classrooms. Student participants ranged from preschool (age 4) to eighth grade (age 16). This paper summarizes the common procedural components found across cases described in the studies. A comparison of PPR-based interventions reported in the literature by various research teams also revealed differences in the procedures for targeting individuals or groups, providing training and support, allocating rewards, proceeding with daily peer report sessions, and terminating the intervention. Variations in specific procedural elements that may relate to PPR’s effectiveness are discussed. The authors also provide suggestions to guide and support the advancement of standardized methods of PPR for future research and clinical application.
机译:积极的同伴报告(PPR)是一项基于课堂的干预措施,旨在通过奖励和积极的社会关注来改善学生之间的社交互动。自从开发以来,PPR伴随着一种称为“ Tootling”的程序变体,已经显示出压倒性的积极成果。但是,尚未建立成功实施PPR干预措施的统一标准协议。一项对24项研究的回顾,包括在教室环境中分别描述的48例PPR案例,提供了有关特殊教育,替代学校和主流教室中学生适应的信息。学生参加者的年龄从学龄前(4岁)到八年级(16岁)。本文总结了研究中描述的案例中常见的程序组成部分。各个研究小组在文献中报告的基于PPR的干预措施的比较还显示,针对个人或群体,提供培训和支持,分配奖励,进行每日同行报告会以及终止干预措施的程序存在差异。讨论了可能与PPR的有效性有关的特定程序元素的变化。作者还提供了一些建议,以指导和支持PPR标准化方法的发展,以用于将来的研究和临床应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号