首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation >Validity of treadmill- and track-based individual calibration methods for estimating free-living walking speed and VO2 using the Actigraph accelerometer
【2h】

Validity of treadmill- and track-based individual calibration methods for estimating free-living walking speed and VO2 using the Actigraph accelerometer

机译:基于Actigraph加速度计的基于跑步机和轨道的单独校准方法用于估算自由行走速度和VO2的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundFor many patients clinical prescription of walking will be beneficial to health and accelerometers can be used to monitor their walking intensity, frequency and duration over many days. Walking intensity should include establishment of individual specific accelerometer count, walking speed and energy expenditure (VO2) relationships and this can be achieved using a walking protocol on a treadmill or overground. However, differences in gait mechanics during treadmill compared to overground walking may result in inaccurate estimations of free-living walking speed and VO2. The aims of this study were to compare the validity of track- and treadmill-based calibration methods for estimating free-living level walking speed and VO2 and to explain between-method differences in accuracy of estimation.
机译:背景技术对于许多患者而言,步行的临床处方将有益于健康,并且加速度计可用于监测他们在许多天内的步行强度,频率和持续时间。步行强度应包括建立个人特定的加速度计计数,步行速度和能量消耗(VO2)关系,这可以通过在跑步机或地面上使用步行协议来实现。但是,相比于地面行走,跑步机上步态力学的差异可能导致自由行走速度和VO2的估算不准确。这项研究的目的是比较基于轨道和跑步机的校准方法在估算自由生活水平步行速度和VO2方面的有效性,并解释估算方法准确性之间的方法差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号