首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Increasing numbers of bird species result from taxonomic progress not taxonomic inflation
【2h】

Increasing numbers of bird species result from taxonomic progress not taxonomic inflation

机译:鸟类数量的增加是由于生物分类的进步而不是生物分类的膨胀

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The impact and significance of modern taxonomy on other fields in biology have been subjects of much debate. It has been proposed that increasing numbers of vertebrate species are largely owing to ‘taxonomic inflation’. According to this hypothesis, newly recognized species result from reinterpretations of species limits based on phylogenetic species concepts (PSCs) rather than from new discoveries. Here, I examine 747 proposals to change the taxonomic rank of birds in the period 1950–2007. The trend to recognize more species of birds started at least two decades before the introduction of PSCs. Most (84.6%) newly recognized species were supported by new taxonomic data. Proposals to recognize more species resulted from application of all six major taxonomic criteria. Many newly recognized species (63.4%) were not based exclusively on PSC-based criteria (diagnosability, monophyly and exclusive coalescence of gene trees). Therefore, this study finds no empirical support for the idea that the increase in species is primarily epistemological rather than data-driven. This study shows that previous claims about the causes and effects of taxonomic inflation lack empirical support. I argue that a more appropriate term for the increase in species is ‘taxonomic progress’.
机译:现代分类学对生物学其他领域的影响和意义一直是许多争论的主题。已经提出,脊椎动物种类的增加主要是由于“生物分类膨胀”。根据该假设,新识别的物种是基于系统发生物种概念(PSC)而不是新发现重新解释物种极限的结果。在这里,我研究了747项更改1950-2007年鸟类分类学等级的提案。引入更多种鸟类的趋势至少在引入PSC之前的二十年就开始了。大多数新识别的物种(84.6%)得到了新的分类学数据的支持。应用所有六个主要生物分类标准产生了承认更多物种的建议。许多新认识的物种(63.4%)并非仅基于基于PSC的标准(基因树的可诊断性,单一性和专有合并性)。因此,本研究没有发现物种增加主要是认识论而不是数据驱动的观点的经验支持。这项研究表明,先前有关分类学通货膨胀原因和影响的主张缺乏经验支持。我认为对物种增加而言更合适的术语是“分类学进展”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号