首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Evaluation of pleural CYFRA 21-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.
【2h】

Evaluation of pleural CYFRA 21-1 and carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions.

机译:评价胸膜CYFRA 21-1和癌胚抗原在恶性胸腔积液的诊断中的价值。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

CYFRA 21-1 assay, measuring cytokeratin 19 fragments, was compared with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay, as an addition to cytological analysis for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. Both markers were determined with commercial enzyme immunoassays in pleural fluid from 196 patients. Cytological analysis and/or pleural biopsy confirmed the malignant origin of the effusion in 99 patients (76 carcinomas, nine pleural mesotheliomas and 14 non-epithelial malignancies). Effusions were confirmed as benign in 97 patients (33 cardiac failures, 39 infectious diseases--including 12 tuberculosis-- and 25 miscellaneous effusions). Both markers were significantly higher in malignant than in benign effusions. All the patients with non-epithelial malignancies presented CYFRA and CEA values lower than the 95% diagnostic specificity thresholds (100 and 6 ng ml(-1) respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity in the group of carcinomas and mesotheliomas was similar for CYFRA (58.8%) and CEA (64.7%). However, CEA had a significantly higher sensitivity in carcinomas (72.4% vs 55.3%), while CYFRA had a clearly higher sensitivity in mesotheliomas (89.9% vs 0%). Interestingly, 12 out of the 16 malignant effusions with a negative cytology were CEA and/or CYFRA positive. Regarding their high diagnostic sensitivity and their complementarity, CEA and CYFRA appear to be very useful for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions when cytology is negative.
机译:CYFRA 21-1测定法(测量细胞角蛋白19片段)与癌胚抗原(CEA)测定法进行了比较,作为细胞学分析的补充,用于诊断恶性积液。两种标记物均通过商业酶免疫法在196例胸膜液中确定。细胞学分析和/或胸膜活检证实了99例患者的积液的恶性起源(76例癌,9例胸膜间皮瘤和14例非上皮性恶性肿瘤)。在97例患者中证实了积液是良性的(33例心力衰竭,39种传染病-包括12例结核病-和25例其他积液)。两种标志物在恶性肿瘤中均明显高于良性积液。所有非上皮性恶性肿瘤患者的CYFRA和CEA值均低于95%的诊断特异性阈值(分别为100和6 ng ml(-1))。 CYFRA(58.8%)和CEA(64.7%)在癌症和间皮瘤组中的诊断敏感性相似。然而,CEA在癌症中的敏感性显着更高(72.4%对55.3%),而CYFRA在间皮瘤中的敏感性明显更高(89.9%对0%)。有趣的是,在16例细胞学阴性的恶性积液中,有12例是CEA和/或CYFRA阳性。关于它们的高诊断敏感性和互补性,当细胞学检查阴性时,CEA和CYFRA似乎对诊断恶性胸腔积液非常有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号