首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >A Possible Combination of Hypoxic Cell Sensitizer with an Oxic Protector: Implications for Radiotherapy
【2h】

A Possible Combination of Hypoxic Cell Sensitizer with an Oxic Protector: Implications for Radiotherapy

机译:缺氧细胞增敏剂与氧气保护剂的可能组合:放射治疗的意义。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper discusses the results of experiments using γ-rays and a hypoxic sensitizer metronidazole (MET) and also a well-known protector, mercaptoethylamine (MEA), individually and in combination, on the survival of the yeast S. cerevisiae BZ 34. MET (5mM) gave a hypoxic enhancement ratio (ER) of 1·3. MEA (5mM, 10mM) gave a dose-modifying factor (DMF) of 1·9 and 2·3 respectively for euoxic cells. However, the DMFs for hypoxic cells were 1·0 and 1·1 for 5 and 10mM concentrations of MEA. A combination of 5mM MEA and 5mM MET gave a DMF of 2·0 for euoxic cells and the ER remained at 1·3 for hypoxic cells. The “effective” oxygen enhancement ratios were 2·3 and 1·7 for the control and the sensitizer respectively. In the combination this value was equal to or even slightly less than 1. All DMF, ER and OER values were derived from D0 values of the survival curves. The values based on 10% survival are almost equal to those derived from D0 values. All the survival curves gave the same extrapolation number, showing that the chemicals individually or in combination were truly dose-modifying.These results indicate that protectors such as MEA could be preferentially protecting euoxic cells, and that combining such “oxic protectors” with a hypoxic sensitizer could result in protecting euoxic cells while the sensitization of hypoxic cells was not much reduced. The implications of our results for radiotherapy are discussed. It appears that the use of nontoxic oxic protectors may be a useful adjuvant in overcoming the hypoxic-cell problem in radiotherapy.
机译:本文讨论了使用γ射线和低氧敏化剂甲硝唑(MET)以及众所周知的保护剂巯基乙胺(MEA)单独或组合使用对酿酒酵母BZ 34存活的实验结果。MET (5mM)的缺氧增强率(ER)为1·3。 MEA(5mM,10mM)对常氧细胞的剂量调节因子(DMF)分别为1·9和2·3。但是,对于5和10mM浓度的MEA,低氧细胞的DMF为1·0和1·1。 5mM MEA和5mM MET的组合对常氧细胞的DMF为2·0,对低氧细胞的ER保持在1·3。对照和敏化剂的“有效”氧增强比分别为2·3和1·7。在组合中,该值等于或略小于1。所有DMF,ER和OER值均来自生存曲线的D0值。基于10%生存率的值几乎等于从D0值得出的值。所有存活曲线均给出相同的外推数,表明这些化学物质的单独或组合均可真正改变剂量。这些结果表明,诸如MEA之类的保护剂可以优先保护常氧细胞,并且将此类“有氧保护剂”与低氧结合使用敏化剂可以保护正常氧细胞,而低氧细胞的敏化作用却不会大大降低。讨论了我们的结果对放射治疗的意义。看来,使用无毒的氧气保护剂可能是克服放射治疗中缺氧细胞问题的有用佐剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号