首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >GP selection of postgraduate education courses has implications for colleagues: messages for course providers and for those writing practice professional development plans.
【2h】

GP selection of postgraduate education courses has implications for colleagues: messages for course providers and for those writing practice professional development plans.

机译:研究生教育课程的GP选择对同事有影响:课程提供者和撰写实践专业发展计划的人员的信息。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Department of Health's review of continuing professional development in general practice advocates setting team and individual goals. AIM: To explore how general practitioners (GPs) share learning experiences with colleagues, focusing on how GPs choose courses as one factor influencing sharing. METHOD: Interviews were conducted with 21 GPs using grounded theory methodology. The responses were coded by six researchers from psychology, education, and general practice. RESULTS: Much sharing with colleagues took place, though not always immediately following a course. GP explanations revealed four reasons for course selection that influenced the degree of sharing: 1. Attendance to meet group needs encouraged rapid sharing and could involve course attendance with colleagues. 2. Attendance to enhance 'special interests' could either encourage or inhibit sharing. 3. Attendance in pursuit of 'personal interests' peripheral to general practice did not result in sharing within the primary care team. 4. Attendance to meet personal learning needs did not involve sharing when needs were not currently shared with colleagues. CONCLUSION: Course selection and subsequent sharing have implications for course providers and those writing personal and practice professional development plans.
机译:背景:卫生部对一般实践中持续专业发展的审查提倡设定团队和个人目标。目的:探讨全科医生(GP)如何与同事分享学习经验,重点是GP如何选择课程作为影响共享的一个因素。方法:采用扎根理论方法对21名全科医生进行访谈。答复由来自心理学,教育和一般实践的六位研究人员编码。结果:与同事进行了很多共享,尽管并非总是紧随课程之后。 GP的解释揭示了影响共享程度的四个选择课程的原因:1.满足小组需求的参加鼓励了快速共享,并且可能需要与同事一起参加课程。 2.参加提高“特殊利益”的活动可能会鼓励或抑制分享。 3.参加一般实践之外的追求“个人利益”的活动并不会导致初级保健团队之间的共享。 4.在当前未与同事共享需求时,满足个人学习需求的出勤不涉及共享。结论:课程选择和随后的共享对课程提供者以及编写个人和实践专业发展计划的人员具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号