首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >Use of acute medical and general-practitioner beds by the practitioners working in one new town
【2h】

Use of acute medical and general-practitioner beds by the practitioners working in one new town

机译:在一个新镇工作的从业人员使用急性医疗床和全科医生床

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients admitted to hospital by a defined group of general practitioners under their own care differ in age, diagnostic category, perceived needs, use of services and outcome, from those admitted by the same general practitioners to consultant beds. However, problems of methodology have to be kept in mind when interpreting the results.These findings suggest that general practitioners see consultant and general-practitioner care as having different attributes but only broadly indicate the nature of these. This study has not attempted to answer the question of outcome: What are the needs of the patient which can be most satisfactorily met by different forms of care—consultant care, general-practitioner care in hospital, and general-practitioner care at home?The next stage must be the development of both a more valid measure of a wide range of needs, and controlled trials of care into the effects of different forms and place of care on patients with differing types of needs.
机译:由一定范围的全科医生照料而入院的患者,其年龄,诊断类别,感知的需求,服务的使用和结局有所不同,从同一位全科医生入院到咨询床位。但是,在解释结果时必须注意方法论问题。这些发现表明,全科医生将顾问和全科医生护理视为具有不同的属性,但仅广泛地指出了这些属性的性质。这项研究并未试图回答结果问题:通过各种形式的护理(顾问护理,医院的全科医生护理和在家的全科医生护理)可以最满意地满足患者的需求?下一阶段必须是既开发更有效的方法来满足广泛的需求,又要对不同形式和场所对不同类型需求的患者的影响进行对照试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号