首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the World Health Organization >Safety effectiveness and ease of use of a non-reusable syringe in a developing country immunization programme.
【2h】

Safety effectiveness and ease of use of a non-reusable syringe in a developing country immunization programme.

机译:发展中国家免疫计划中不可重复使用的注射器的安全性有效性和易用性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Unsterile needles and syringes may transmit blood-borne infectious agents such as HIV and hepatitis B virus. The emergence of these diseases as major public health concerns and the risk of nosocomial transmission has heightened interest in the development of single-use injection devices. WHO and UNICEF embarked on a programme to develop and introduce these devices in 1987. We report on a field trial in Karachi, Pakistan, of the SoloShot (SS) plastic disposable syringe, which has a metal clip in the syringe barrel to prevent second-time withdrawal of the plunger. A conventional disposable syringe (CS) was used as a comparison. We observed 48 vaccinators giving 2400 injections with the SS and 1440 with the CS; 98.7% of SS performed as designed. The average volume required per delivered dose was comparable for the two syringes and was delivered more quickly with SS. Training and experience had a small but statistically significant effect on several aspects of SS use. Vaccinators who indicated a syringe preference preferred SS on 7 out of 9 indicators. SS is safe and effective in preventing reuse and is easier and quicker to use than the CS. Vaccinators require little, if any, special training. It could directly replace disposable syringes in expanded programmes on immunization (EPI) in countries where use of unsterile disposable devices occurs or when sterilization is not practical.
机译:未消毒的针头和注射器可能传播诸如艾滋病毒和乙型肝炎病毒之类的血源性传染病。这些疾病作为主要的公共卫生问题和医院内传播风险的出现,引起了人们对一次性注射装置发展的兴趣。世卫组织和联合国儿童基金会于1987年启动了一项开发和引进这些装置的计划。我们报道了在巴基斯坦卡拉奇进行的SoloShot(SS)塑料一次性注射器的现场试验,该注射器在注射器针筒中装有一个金属夹,以防止第二次发生这种情况。时间撤回柱塞。将常规的一次性注射器(CS)用作比较。我们观察到48位疫苗接种者使用SS注射2400次,使用CS注射1440次; SS达到设计的98.7%。每个注射剂量所需的平均体积与两个注射器相当,并且使用SS可以更快地递送。培训和经验对SS使用的多个方面影响很小,但在统计学上却具有重要意义。指示注射器偏爱的疫苗接种者在9个指标中有7个更喜欢SS。 SS可以安全有效地防止重复使用,并且比CS更加易于使用。疫苗接种者几乎不需要特殊培训。在使用未消毒的一次性器械或不可行消毒的国家,它可以在扩大的免疫计划(EPI)中直接替代一次性注射器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号