首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Imaging >Assessing the effect of CT slice interval on unidimensional bidimensional and volumetric measurements of solid tumours
【2h】

Assessing the effect of CT slice interval on unidimensional bidimensional and volumetric measurements of solid tumours

机译:评估CT切片间隔对实体瘤的一维二维和体积测量的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: To study the magnitude of differences in tumour unidimensional (1D), bidimensional (2D) and volumetric (VOL) measurements determined from computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed at 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mm slice intervals. >Materials and Methods: A total of 118 lesions in lung, liver and lymph nodes were selected from 30 patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials. Each CT scan was reconstructed at 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mm slice intervals during the image acquisition. Lesions were semi-automatically segmented on each interval image series and supervised by a radiologist. 1D, 2D and VOL were computed based on the final segmentation results. Average measurement differences across different slice intervals were obtained using linear mixed-effects analysis of variance models. >Results: Lesion diameters ranged from 6.1 to 80.1 mm (median 18.4 mm). The largest difference was seen between 1.25 and 5 mm (mean difference of 7.6% for 1D [P < 0.0001], 13.1% for 2D [P < 0.0001], −5.7% for VOL [P = 0.0001]). Mean differences between 1.25 and 2.5 mm were all within ±3.5% (within ±6% confidence interval). For VOL, there was a larger average difference between measurements on different slice intervals for the smaller lesions (<10 mm) compared with the larger lesions. >Conclusions: Different slice intervals may give different 1D, 2D and VOL measurements. In clinical practice, it would be prudent to use the same slice interval for consecutive measurements.
机译:>目标:研究从以5、2.5和1.25mm切片间隔重建的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像确定的肿瘤一维(1D),二维(2D)和体积(VOL)测量值的差异幅度。 >材料和方法:从参与早期临床试验的30例患者中共选择了118个肺,肝和淋巴结病变。在图像采集期间,以5、2.5和1.25mm的切片间隔重建每个CT扫描。在每个间隔图像系列上对病变进行半自动分割,并由放射科医生进行监督。根据最终的分割结果计算1D,2D和VOL。使用方差模型的线性混合效应分析获得了不同切片间隔的平均测量差异。 >结果:病变直径范围从6.1到80.1 mm(中值18.4 mm)。在1.25mm和5mm之间观察到最大的差异(1D [P <0.0001]的平均差异为7.6%,2D [P <0.0001]的平均差异为13.1%,VOL [P = 0.0001]的平均差异为-5.7%)。 1.25和2.5mm之间的平均差异均在±3.5%以内(在±6%的置信区间内)。对于VOL,较小的病变(<10mm)与较大的病变相比,在不同切片间隔的测量值之间存在较大的平均差异。 >结论:不同的切片间隔可能会提供不同的1D,2D和VOL测量值。在临床实践中,谨慎使用相同的切片间隔进行连续测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号