首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancers >Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy after Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study
【2h】

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy after Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study

机译:立体定向放射疗法作为不完全射频消融治疗肝细胞癌的挽救疗法:回顾性倾向评分匹配研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract: (1) Background: To investigate the clinical outcomes between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for residual hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC). (2) Methods: 139 patients were diagnosed with the RHCC after post-operative checkup, among whom 39 and 33 patients underwent RFA or SBRT as salvage treatments, respectively. We applied the propensity score matching (PSM) to adjust for imbalances in treatment assignment. Local disease progression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related side effects were the study endpoints. (3) Results: Before PSM, the SBRT group demonstrated significantly lower local disease progression rate (6/33 vs. 23/39; p = 0.002), better PFS (the 1- and 3-year PFS were 63.3% and 49.3% vs. 41.5% and 22.3%, respectively, p = 0.036), and comparable OS (the 1- and 3-year OS were 85.4% and 71.1% vs. 97.3% and 57.6%, respectively, p = 0.680). After PSM of 23 matched cases, the SBRT group demonstrated significantly lower local disease progression rate, better PFS and comparable OS. Centrally located tumor predicted the worse OS. No acute grade 3+ toxicity was observed in both groups. (4) Conclusion: SBRT might be the preferred treatment for RHCC, especially for patients with larger tumors or tumors abutting major vessels, rather than repeated RFA.
机译:摘要:(1)背景:研究射频消融(RFA)与立体定向放射疗法(SBRT)治疗残留肝细胞癌(RHCC)的临床疗效。 (2)方法:139例术后检查后被诊断为RHCC,其中分别接受RFA或SBRT作为救治方法的39例和33例。我们应用倾向得分匹配(PSM)来调整治疗分配中的失衡。研究的终点是局部疾病进展,无进展生存期(PFS),总生存期(OS)和与治疗相关的副作用。 (3)结果:在PSM之前,SBRT组显示出较低的局部疾病进展率(6/33对23/39; p = 0.002),PFS更好(1年和3年PFS分别为63.3%和49.3%分别为41.5%和22.3%,p = 0.036)和可比较的OS(1年和3年OS为85.4%和71.1%,而97.3%和57.6%分别为p = 0.680)。在23例匹配病例的PSM后,SBRT组显示出明显更低的局部疾病进展率,更好的PFS和相当的OS。位于中心的肿瘤预示着较差的OS。两组均未观察到急性3+级毒性。 (4)结论:SBRT可能是RHCC的首选治疗方法,尤其是对于较大肿瘤或毗邻主要血管的肿瘤患者,而不是重复RFA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号