首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Benefit–Cost Analysis of Undergraduate Education Programs: An Example Analysis of the Freshman Research Initiative
【2h】

Benefit–Cost Analysis of Undergraduate Education Programs: An Example Analysis of the Freshman Research Initiative

机译:本科教育课程的收益—成本分析:新生研究计划的实例分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Institutions and administrators regularly have to make difficult choices about how best to invest resources to serve students. Yet economic evaluation, or the systematic analysis of the relationship between costs and outcomes of a program or policy, is relatively uncommon in higher education. This type of evaluation can be an important tool for decision makers considering questions of resource allocation. Our purpose with this essay is to describe methods for conducting one type of economic evaluation, a benefit–cost analysis (BCA), using an example of an existing undergraduate education program, the Freshman Research Initiative (FRI) at the University of Texas Austin. Our aim is twofold: to demonstrate how to apply BCA methodologies to evaluate an education program and to conduct an economic evaluation of FRI in particular. We explain the steps of BCA, including assessment of costs and benefits, estimation of the benefit–cost ratio, and analysis of uncertainty. We conclude that the university’s investment in FRI generates a positive return for students in the form of increased future earning potential.
机译:机构和管理人员通常必须在如何最好地投入资源为学生服务方面做出艰难的选择。然而,经济评估或对计划或政策的成本与结果之间关系的系统分析在高等教育中相对较少见。对于决策者考虑资源分配的问题,这种评估可能是重要的工具。本文的目的是,以德克萨斯州奥斯汀大学的现有本科教育计划(新生研究计划)为例,描述进行一种经济评估的方法,即收益成本分析(BCA)。我们的目标是双重的:演示如何应用BCA方法来评估教育计划,尤其是对FRI进行经济评估。我们解释了BCA的步骤,包括成本和收益的评估,收益与成本比的估计以及不确定性的分析。我们得出的结论是,大学对FRI的投资以增加未来的收入潜力的形式为学生带来了正回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号