首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >A Comparison of Jump Height Takeoff Velocities and Blocking Coverage in the Swing and Traditional Volleyball Blocking Techniques
【2h】

A Comparison of Jump Height Takeoff Velocities and Blocking Coverage in the Swing and Traditional Volleyball Blocking Techniques

机译:秋千和传统排球拦网技术中跳跃高度起飞速度和拦网覆盖率的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare traditional and swing blocking techniques on center of mass (COM) projectile motion and effective blocking area in nine healthy Division I female volleyball players. Two high-definition (1080 p) video cameras (60 Hz) were used to collect two-dimensional variables from two separate views. One was placed perpendicular to the plane of the net and the other was directed along the top of the net, and were used to estimate COM locations and blocking area in a plane parallel to the net and hand penetration through the plane of the net respectively. Video of both the traditional and swing techniques were digitized and kinematic variables were calculated. Paired samples t-tests indicated that the swing technique resulted in greater (p < 0.05) vertical and horizontal takeoff velocities (vy and vx), jump height (H), duration of the block (tBLOCK), blocking coverage during the block (C) as well as hand penetration above and through the net’s plane (YPEN, ZPEN). The traditional technique had significantly greater approach time (tAPP). The results of this study suggest that the swing technique results in both greater jump height and effective blocking area. However, the shorter tAPP that occurs with swing is associated with longer times in the air during the block which may reduce the ability of the athlete to make adjustments to attacks designed to misdirect the defense.Key Points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Swing blocking technique has greater jump height, effective blocking area, hand penetration, horizontal and vertical takeoff velocity, and has a shorter time of approach.Despite these advantages, there may be more potential for mistiming blocks and having erratic deflections of the ball after contact when using the swing technique.Coaches should take more than simple jump height and hand penetration into account when deciding which technique to employ.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较9名健康的I级女排运动员在质心(COM)弹丸运动和有效阻滞区域上的传统阻滞技术和挥杆阻滞技术。使用两个高清(1080 p)摄像机(60 Hz)从两个单独的视图收集二维变量。一个放置在垂直于网平面的位置,另一个放置在沿着网顶部的方向,分别用于估计COM的位置和平行于网的平面中的遮挡面积,以及手穿过网平面的穿透程度。将传统技术和挥杆技术的视频数字化并计算运动学变量。成对的样本t检验表明,摆动技术导致垂直和水平起飞速度(vy和vx),跳跃高度(H),滑行持续时间(tBLOCK),滑行期间的滑行覆盖范围(C)更大(p <0.05) )以及手在网平面(YPEN,ZPEN)上的穿透力。传统技术的进场时间(tAPP)明显更长。这项研究的结果表明,摆动技术会导致更大的跳跃高度和有效的阻挡区域。但是,随着挥杆动作而产生的tAPP越短,则在空中进行的时间越长,这可能会降低运动员调整旨在误导防守的进攻的能力。要点 class =“ unordered” style = “ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 摇摆阻挡技术具有更大的跳跃高度,有效 尽管有这些优点,但使用时可能有更大的潜力使障碍物雾化并在接触后球的偏斜度增大。 教练在决定采用哪种技巧时,应该考虑的不仅仅是简单的跳跃高度和手的穿透力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号