首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Evaluation of the prognostic value of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus treated with triple or dual antiviral therapy: A prospective pilot study
【2h】

Evaluation of the prognostic value of liver stiffness in patients with hepatitis C virus treated with triple or dual antiviral therapy: A prospective pilot study

机译:三重或双重抗病毒治疗对丙型肝炎病毒患者肝脏僵硬的预后价值评估:一项前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the association between liver stiffness (LS) prior to the initiation of dual/triple therapy and viral response.METHODS: LS was measured in all patients before treatment was administered. The therapeutic approach was based on hepatic, virological, and immunological evaluations and considered the fact that patients with severe fibrosis (F3) or compensated cirrhosis (F4) in Child-Pugh class A are the primary candidates for triple therapy. In total, 65 hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients were treated with Peg-interferon/ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV); 24 patients were classified as genotypes 1/4 (36.92%), and 41 patients were classified as genotypes 2/3 (63.08%) (dual therapy). In addition, 20 HCV treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients were treated with PegIFN-RBV and boceprevir (triple therapy). Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare the groups.RESULTS: LS significantly differed between dual therapy and triple therapy (P = 0.002). The mean LS value before dual therapy treatment was 8.61 ± 5.79 kPa and was significantly different between patients achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR) 24 weeks after therapy and those who did not (7.23 ± 5.18 kPa vs 11.72 ± 5.99 kPa, respectively, P = 0.0003). The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 4.45 (95%CI: 2.32-8.55). The attributable risk of non-response to therapy was 49%. The mean LS value before triple therapy treatment was 13.29 ± 8.57 kPa and was significantly different between patients achieving and not achieving SVR24 (9.41 ± 5.05 vs 19.11 ± 9.74, respectively; P = 0.008). The relative risk of non-response to therapy was 5.57% (95%CI: 1.50-20.65). The attributable risk of non-response to therapy (70%) was increased compared with dual therapy patients. Pre-treatment stiffness > 12 kPa was significantly associated with non-SVR (P < 0.025) in both groups.CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment liver stiffness may be useful for predicting the response to treatment in patients treated with either dual or triple anti-HCV therapy.
机译:目的:评估在开始双重/三联疗法之前肝硬度(LS)与病毒反应之间的关系。方法:在所有患者接受治疗前均测量了LS。该治疗方法基于肝,病毒学和免疫学评估,并考虑到Child-Pugh A级重度纤维化(F3)或代偿性肝硬化(F4)患者是三联疗法的主要候选人。总共有65例丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者接受了聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林(Peg-IFN / RBV)治疗; 24例患者被归为基因型1/4(36.92%),41例患者被归为基因型2/3(63.08%)(双重治疗)。另外,用PegIFN-RBV和boceprevir(三联疗法)治疗了20例接受过HCV治疗的基因型1患者。结果:两组间LS的差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。双重疗法治疗前的平均LS值为8.61±5.79 kPa,在治疗后24周达到持续病毒学应答(SVR)的患者与未达到的患者之间存在显着差异(分别为7.23±5.18 kPa和11.72±5.99 kPa,P = 0.0003)。对治疗无反应的相对风险为4.45(95%CI:2.32-8.55)。对治疗无反应的可归因风险为49%。三联疗法治疗前的平均LS值为13.29±8.57 kPa,达到和未达到SVR24的患者之间存在显着差异(分别为9.41±5.05与19.11±9.74; P = 0.008)。对治疗无反应的相对风险为5.57%(95%CI:1.50-20.65)。与双重治疗患者相比,对治疗无反应的可归因风险(70%)增加了。两组患者的治疗前硬度> 12 kPa与非SVR显着相关(P <0.025)。结论:治疗前肝硬度可能有助于预测接受双重或三联抗HCV治疗的患者对治疗的反应治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号