首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Vascular Health and Risk Management >Drug eluting stents: Focus on Cypher™ sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with bifurcation lesions
【2h】

Drug eluting stents: Focus on Cypher™ sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with bifurcation lesions

机译:药物洗脱支架:专注于Cypher™西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗分叉病变患者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Coronary bifurcations represent a challenging lesions subset and account for up to 15% of all current PCI. Regardless of the stenting technique used, however, restenosis rate after bare metal stent (BMS) is high, especially at the ostium of the side branch (SB). The introduction of drug-eluting stent (DES) has remarkably improved the outcome in bifurcation lesions compared to BMS, resulting in lower adverse events and main branch (MB) restenosis rates. Furthermore, although the “provisional” stenting technique (second stent on the SB placed, after the MB stenting, only in case of suboptimal or inadequate result) remained the prevailing approach, several two-stent techniques emerged (crush) or were re-introduced (V, T, culottes) to allow stenting in both branches when needed. At the present time, only few randomized studies and some observational reports specifically addressed the issue of bifurcation lesion treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). It is still not clear yet which is the better strategy between the provisional approach and stenting both branches when dealing with a bifurcation lesion which has a stenosis in the SB suitable for stenting. Moreover, no study has so far addressed which is the best strategy to use among the several techniques reported in the literature when both branches are intentionally stented from the outset. Finally, the introduction of dedicated stents for different types of bifurcations, with specific stent designs to provide good deliverability, secured access to the side branch, complete coverage of the lesion site without double/triple layers of stent struts, thus incorporating the benefits of drug elution and ensuring drug availability to all diseased surfaces, may further facilitate the conquest of one of the most challenging areas in interventional cardiology.
机译:冠状动脉分叉代表了具有挑战性的病变子集,占目前所有PCI的15%。但是,无论使用哪种支架技术,裸金属支架(BMS)后的再狭窄率都很高,尤其是在侧支(SB)的口处。与BMS相比,药物洗脱支架(DES)的引入显着改善了分叉病变的预后,从而降低了不良事件和主分支(MB)的再狭窄率。此外,尽管仍采用“临时”支架技术(在MB支架后仅在SB上放置第二个支架,仅在结果不理想或结果不佳的情况下),但仍采用了两种支架技术(压碎)或重新引入了两种支架技术。 (V,T,裙裤),以便在需要时在两个分支中都置入支架。目前,只有很少的随机研究和一些观察性报告专门针对西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)治疗分叉病变的问题。尚不清楚在临时性方法和将两个分支都置入支架之间的更好策略是在分叉病变中,该病变在SB狭窄,适合于支架置入。此外,到目前为止,还没有研究解决从文献开始就故意将两个分支都置入支架的情况,这是文献报道的几种技术中最好的策略。最后,针对不同类型分叉的专用支架的引入,具有特定的支架设计,以提供良好的可传递性,安全地进入侧支,完全覆盖病变部位而没有支架撑杆的双层/三层,从而具有药物的优势洗脱并确保所有患病表面均具有药物可利用性,这可能进一步有助于征服介入心脏病学中最具挑战性的领域之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号