首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Field Performance of Nine Soil Water Content Sensors on a Sandy Loam Soil in New Brunswick Maritime Region Canada
【2h】

Field Performance of Nine Soil Water Content Sensors on a Sandy Loam Soil in New Brunswick Maritime Region Canada

机译:加拿大新不伦瑞克省沙质壤土上的九种土壤水分传感器的田间性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An in situ field test on nine commonly-used soil water sensors was carried out in a sandy loam soil located in the Potato Research Center, Fredericton, NB (Canada) using the gravimetric method as a reference. The results showed that among the tested sensors, regardless of installation depths and soil water regimes, CS615, Trase, and Troxler performed the best with the factory calibrations, with a relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of 15.78, 16.93, and 17.65%, and a r2 of 0.75, 0.77, and 0.65, respectively. TRIME, Moisture Point (MP917), and Gopher performed slightly worse with the factory calibrations, with a RRMSE of 45.76, 26.57, and 20.41%, and a r2 of 0.65, 0.72, and 0.78, respectively, while the Gypsum, WaterMark, and Netafim showed a frequent need for calibration in the application in this region.
机译:使用重量分析法作为参考,在位于北卡罗来纳州弗雷德里克顿(Fredericton)(加拿大)马铃薯研究中心的砂壤土上对九种常用土壤水传感器进行了现场测试。结果表明,在经过测试的传感器中,无论安装深度和土壤水分状况如何,CS615,Trase和Troxler的出厂校准均表现最佳,相对均方根误差(RRMSE)为15.78、16.93和17.65% ,和ar 2 分别为0.75、0.77和0.65。 TRIME,水分点(MP917)和Gopher在出厂时的校准情况稍差一些,RRMSE分别为45.76、26.57和20.41%,ar 2 分别为0.65、0.72和0.78,而石膏,WaterMark和耐特菲姆(Netafim)在该地区的应用中经常需要校准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号