首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >The Study Protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest) Study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation
【2h】

The Study Protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in Cardiac Arrest) Study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation

机译:LINC(心脏骤停中的LUCAS)研究的研究方案:一项将常规成人院外心肺复苏与机械胸外按压同时除颤的概念进行比较的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe LUCAS™ device delivers mechanical chest compressions that have been shown in experimental studies to improve perfusion pressures to the brain and heart as well as augmenting cerebral blood flow and end tidal CO2, compared with results from standard manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Two randomised pilot studies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients have not shown improved outcome when compared with manual CPR. There remains evidence from small case series that the device can be potentially beneficial compared with manual chest compressions in specific situations. This multicentre study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device whilst allowing defibrillation during on-going CPR, and comparing the results with those of conventional resuscitation.
机译:背景技术与标准的手动心肺复苏(CPR)结果相比,LUCAS™设备可提供机械胸部按压,实验研究已证明该按压可改善对大脑和心脏的灌注压力,并增加脑血流量和潮气末CO2。与手动心肺复苏术相比,两项针对院外心脏骤停患者的随机先导研究并未显示出改善的预后。从小病例系列中仍然有证据表明,与特定情况下的手动胸部按压相比,该设备具有潜在的优势。这项多中心研究旨在评估使用LUCAS™设备进行机械式胸部按压的有效性和安全性,同时在进行持续的CPR时可进行除颤,并将结果与​​常规复苏进行比较。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号