首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM >Are human embryos Kantian persons?: Kantian considerations in favor of embryonic stem cell research
【2h】

Are human embryos Kantian persons?: Kantian considerations in favor of embryonic stem cell research

机译:人类胚胎是Kantian人吗?:Kantian考虑支持胚胎干细胞研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One argument used by detractors of human embryonic stem cell research (hESCR) invokes Kant's formula of humanity, which proscribes treating persons solely as a means to an end, rather than as ends in themselves. According to Fuat S. Oduncu, for example, adhering to this imperative entails that human embryos should not be disaggregated to obtain pluripotent stem cells for hESCR. Given that human embryos are Kantian persons from the time of their conception, killing them to obtain their cells for research fails to treat them as ends in themselves.This argument assumes two points that are rather contentious given a Kantian framework. First, the argument assumes that when Kant maintains that humanity must be treated as an end in itself, he means to argue that all members of the species Homo sapiens must be treated as ends in themselves; that is, that Kant regards personhood as co-extensive with belonging to the species Homo sapiens. Second, the argument assumes that the event of conception is causally responsible for the genesis of a Kantian person and that, therefore, an embryo is a Kantian person from the time of its conception.In this paper, I will present challenges against these two assumptions by engaging in an exegetical study of some of Kant's works. First, I will illustrate that Kant did not use the term "humanity" to denote a biological species, but rather the capacity to set ends according to reason. Second, I will illustrate that it is difficult given a Kantian framework to denote conception (indeed any biological event) as causally responsible for the creation of a person. Kant ascribed to a dualistic view of human agency, and personhood, according to him, was derived from the supersensible capacity for reason. To argue that a Kantian person is generated due to the event of conception ignores Kant's insistence in various aspects of his work that it is not possible to understand the generation of a person qua a physical operation. Finally, I will end the paper by drawing from Allen Wood's work in Kantian philosophy in order to generate an argument in favor of hESCR.
机译:人类胚胎干细胞研究(hESCR)的批评者所使用的一种论据援引了康德的人类公式,该公式禁止将人仅视为达到目的的手段,而不是作为达到目的的手段。例如,根据Fuat S. Oduncu的观点,坚持这一必要条件意味着不应分解人类胚胎以获得用于hESCR的多能干细胞。鉴于人类胚胎从受孕之初就是康德人,因此将其杀死以获取研究用细胞并不能将其视为自身的目的。该论点假设有两点在康德框架下颇有争议。首先,该论点假设康德主张必须将人类视为自身的目的,他的意思是主张必须将智人物种的所有成员视为自身的目的。就是说,康德认为人格与属于智人物种同在。其次,该论点假设受孕事件是一个康德人的成因的因果关系,因此从受孕之初起胚胎就是康德人。在本文中,我将针对这两个假设提出挑战通过对康德一些作品的诠释研究。首先,我将说明康德并未使用“人类”一词来表示生物物种,而是根据理性设定目的的能力。其次,我将说明,鉴于康德式的框架很难将概念(实际上是任何生物学事件)表示为对人的创造的因果关系。康德归因于人类代理的二元论,而他认为人格是出于理性的超理性能力。认为康德人是由于受孕而产生的,就无视了康德在其工作的各个方面的坚持,即不可能通过物理手术来理解人的产生。最后,我将通过借鉴艾伦·伍德在康德哲学中的著作来结束本文,以产生支持hESCR的论据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号