首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Informatica Medica >At What Level of Collective Equipoise Does a Randomized Clinical Trial Become Ethical for the Members of Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committees?
【2h】

At What Level of Collective Equipoise Does a Randomized Clinical Trial Become Ethical for the Members of Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committees?

机译:在什么级别的集体平衡下对于机构审查委员会/伦理委员会成员而言随机临床试验是否符合伦理道德?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:The conduct of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is deemed ethical only if we are in state of “equipoise” as to which treatment would be most beneficial for the patients. Individual equipoise applies to an individual clinician or a member of ethical, institutional review board (IRB), whilst collective equipoise refers to the profession as a whole. It is argued that physicians are not bound by the equipoise but their actions are directed by the confines of the expert opinion. Experts can agree or disagree in various proportions on the merit of a given treatment. Hence, the collective equipoise will be often incomplete. In turn, the opinions of content expert in the field of the proposed trial influence the IRB members’ decision regarding trial approval.
机译:背景:只有当我们对哪种治疗对患者最有利时处于“平衡”状态时,才进行一项随机对照试验(RCT),这是合乎道德的。个体平衡适用于个体临床医生或伦理,机构审查委员会(IRB)的成员,而集体平衡则指整个职业。有人认为医师不受衡平法的约束,但他们的行为受专家意见的约束。专家可以就给定治疗的优缺点进行不同程度的同意或不同意。因此,集体均衡往往是不完整的。反过来,内容专家在拟议审判领域的意见会影响IRB成员有关审判批准的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号